Scott Mansfield <scott.mansfield@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I have to admit that this kerfuffle is my fault. I'm sorry I haven't
> replied earlier but had a number of issues with traveling back from
> Geneva (long story - not very interesting).
I see how you got to this situation.
> In Appendix B it says the number of nominating committee members.
> Nominating committee members include both voting and non-voting
> members. There is this distinction because there are times when only
> voting members vote (on slates for example) and times when the entire
> nominating committee needs to vote (on processes etc). So, I
> interpreted this to mean that the NomCom Chair should be sensitive to
> the affiliation of all nominating committee members. I check the
> previous 5 years of nomcoms and (unless I missed something) there was
> no nomcom that had more that two people from the same affiliation on
> the nominating committee ( I will check again to be sure).
Okay, but I did not look at the non-selecting (non-voting) members when I did
my elimination, and I suspect that others did not either. It just happened
that this occured.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
