On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 5:52 PM Warren Kumari <warren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [ SNIP] > The (proposed) stable-ietf-foo-bar proposal is / was intended to be a > clear signal that the WG doesn't think that text is sane, not that it > is carved in stone. <blush> "clear signal that the WG doesn't think that text is *insane*". Thanks to the kind soul who pointed that out off-list instead of on...: -) W > > W > > > > > > Keith > > > > > > > -- > I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad > idea in the first place. > This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing > regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair > of pants. > ---maf -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf
