Hi,
A few years back we were asked by the ISOC HR person to not provide a performance review, since that’s inappropriate to do since the RSE is not a contractor. As an RSOC, we’ve since agreed to perform “contract reviews” against goals, and we agreed, prior to the LLC formation, to pick up that process again. Meanwhile, status of the contract and goals is typically discussed each IETF meeting; and a read out of what the RSE is working on is typically covered in the plenary. Moving forward, we’ve agreed as an RSOC to explicitly perform a “contract review” against goals that are drafted, reviewed with the RSOC and IAB (as before) and a way to change the goals and mutually agree on them.
Finally, I believe we also agree that RFC6635 needs to be modified to reflect this change, and keep us clean.
Thanks
Sarah
> On Jun 25, 2019, at 10:10 AM, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Sarah,
>
> The procedures of RFC Series Oversight Committee states that the committee is responsible for overseeing the RSE. I took a look at a few of the reports which was sent by the IAB. None of the reports mentioned that there hasn't been any performance review of the RSE since the last four years. Who is responsible for the non-compliance with RFC 6635?
>
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy
