> On Jul 3, 2019, at 4:37 PM, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Henrik,
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 1:19 PM Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> On 2019-07-03 21:51, Adam Roach wrote:
> > Henrik --
> >
> > Sorry for the delayed response here. I was on holiday through yesterday,
> > and am just now digging out from under the email backlog.
>
> Ah. Ok, understood. Certainly you should be able to have a holiday :-)
>
> > I want to be clear that I'm responding on behalf of myself, and not on
> > behalf of the RSOC as a whole.
> >
> > Ted's email ("RSE bid Process") accurately captures the timeline:
> > Heather's resignation came after the RSOC's recommendation to the IAB,
> > but before the IAB deliberated on said recommendation.
>
> Umm. Yes, I saw that, but I actually asked if Heather's resignation came
> in after _she_ was informed, or before. I have no information telling me
> at which point Heather was informed, relative to RSOC's recommendation to
> the IAB; whether she was copied on that, informed before, or informed after..
>
> The mail to Heather with the recommendation went before the mail to the IAB, but only by a few minutes. Since Heather is on the IAB list which received the recommendation, she would have gotten the same information from that. Unless she happened to be reading her email when the messages were received, it's probably best to treat them as arriving simultaneously.
so Heather resigned after receiving the message (through one or the other path)? (which I think was Henrik’s
question)
Scott
