> On Jul 4, 2019, at 1:47 PM, Pete Resnick via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Reviewer: Pete Resnick >> Review result: Ready with Nits >> >> In Section 2.1 and 2.2, Instead of "set to one" and "set to zero", it would >> read easier with "set to (1)" and "set to (0)", or some similar construction. > > That seems to me to be stylistic - I'm not at all sure what makes "(1)" more readable than "one". I'm making the change, but I can't begin to fathom how it improves the document. Following Don Eastlake's comment, the authors held a powwow on the use of parentheses. We do not find "(0)" more readable than "0" or "zero", and the general sense was that a number of things were parenthesized, such as IPv6 prefixes, that didn't follow usual practice. So I have pulled the parentheses. See attached. I'm also posting the new .txt and .xml, in view of the deadline Monday and my own plans this weekend. I can deal with further commentary when the repository re-opens in a few weeks.
Attachment:
Diff: draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-13.txt - draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-14.txt.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
