On 7/9/19 3:43 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Well, if that interpretation allows non-voting members to vote on issues affecting nomination choices, IMHO it's plain wrong.
If it's any comfort (speaking as IESG liaison to NomCom for last year's cycle), non-voting members did not vote on issues such as questionnaire contents. We (non-voting members) did offer personal observations to the voting members, but it was quite clear that the actual decisions on anything directly related to the nomination process resided solely with voting members. It wouldn't hurt to make the document clearer, but -- at least with a single (albeit time-local) data point -- things don't appear to be going off the rails at the moment.
/a
