Re: The RSE's perspective

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Skickat från min iPhone

25 juni 2019 kl.. 22:56 skrev Richard Barnes <rlb@xxxxxx>:



On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 1:48 PM Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Postel was dead before I entered university

occasionally age is a benefit

Yes, but eventually it isn't.  If you don't bring anyone new into your community, your community doesn't last long.  So maybe help educate us young'uns?
 

> so I'm clear, you think we should pay someone to be RSE, and have
> nobody reviewing their work?

those are your words, not mine.

until the corporitization (rfced forgive me) of the ietf, cooperation,
stewardship, and integrity were more important than hierarchy.

 I'm honestly trying to understand what you're saying here.  Are you saying that we need to focus efforts on finding an RSE that displays those values, as opposed to trying to guard against failures of those values?

--Richard

If guarding against the failure if core values was what the IAB and RSOC was doing it would at least have been a laudable goal.

From the outside it looks rather more like a bunch of folks tinkering away with ”process” at the expense of people.

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux