IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Observers at IAB teleconfernces
- RE: Side Meetings at IETF 103
- Re: [103all] Update on IETF 103 visa information
- Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-use-cases-18
- Re: [Lsr] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-13
- Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-13
- Re: Side Meetings at IETF 103
- Reminder: Registration and Hotel Reservations!
- Last call comment to draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-05
- Side Meetings at IETF 103
- Re: [103all] Update on IETF 103 visa information
- Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-05
- Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-rationale-00
- Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-org-ext-09
- Re: [netmod] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11
- Re: [netmod] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11
- RE: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-10
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-10
- Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11
- Re: Improvements to the mailarch tool, and plans to discontinue the mhonarc archives
- Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-bcp-07
- New work at IETF 103
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Improvements to the mailarch tool, and plans to discontinue the mhonarc archives
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-bcp-07.txt> (Network Time Protocol Best Current Practices) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-bcp-07.txt> (Network Time Protocol Best Current Practices) to Best Current Practice
- Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-10
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-bcp-07.txt> (Network Time Protocol Best Current Practices) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-softwire-yang-06.txt> (YANG Modules for IPv4-in-IPv6 Address plus Port Softwires) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Diversity considerations
- RE: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-problem-statement-06
- From: Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-problem-statement-06
- Re: [Iasa20] Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00.txt> (Update to the Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust) to Best Current Practice
- NomCom 2017: IAOC short-term member update
- Re: [Iasa20] Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00.txt> (Update to the Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [Iasa20] Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00.txt> (Update to the Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust) to Best Current Practice
- Re: acknowledging reviewers better (was Re: Diversity considerations)
- Re: language diversity (was: Re: Diversity considerations)
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00.txt> (Update to the Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust) to Best Current Practice
- Re: language diversity (was: Re: Diversity considerations)
- Re: [Iasa20] Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00.txt> (Update to the Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00.txt> (Update to the Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust) to Best Current Practice
- Re: language diversity (was: Re: Diversity considerations)
- Re: acknowledging reviewers better (was Re: Diversity considerations)
- language diversity (was: Re: Diversity considerations)
- Re: Diversity considerations
- From: Padmadevi Pillay Esnault
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-16
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-16
- Re: [Anima] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-16
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: [Extra] Last Call: <draft-ietf-extra-imap-replace-01.txt> (IMAP REPLACE Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: acknowledging reviewers better (was Re: Diversity considerations)
- Re: [Anima] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-16
- Re: [Anima] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-16
- Re: [Anima] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-16
- Re: acknowledging reviewers better (was Re: Diversity considerations)
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: [Anima] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-16
- RE: [Tzdist-bis] Opsdir last call review of draft-murchison-tzdist-tzif-14
- Re: BoF decision minutes
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: BoF decision minutes
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-16
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: BoF decision minutes
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: BoF decision minutes
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: BoF decision minutes
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Anima] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-16
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: BoF decision minutes
- RE: BoF decision minutes
- BoF decision minutes
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: [Anima] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-16
- Re: acknowledging reviewers better (was Re: Diversity considerations)
- acknowledging reviewers better (was Re: Diversity considerations)
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Diversity considerations
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-16
- Re: Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-problem-statement-06
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-softwire-yang-06.txt> (YANG Modules for IPv4-in-IPv6 Address plus Port Softwires) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: [Tzdist-bis] Opsdir last call review of draft-murchison-tzdist-tzif-14
- Re: [Tzdist-bis] Genart last call review of draft-murchison-tzdist-tzif-14
- RE: Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-problem-statement-06
- From: Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Netconf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-16
- Genart last call review of draft-murchison-tzdist-tzif-14
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: nation state crypto profiles - draft-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile-00
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-16
- Re: [Anima] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-16
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-problem-statement-06
- Re: [Anima] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-16
- Re: [Anima] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-16
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom)
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-16
- Re: Diversity considerations
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-16
- Re: nation state crypto profiles - draft-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile-00
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom)
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom)
- Tsvart telechat review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-10
- Re: Diversity considerations
- RE: Opsdir last call review of draft-murchison-tzdist-tzif-14
- Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-architecture-08
- Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cbor-cddl-05
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-05
- Re: nation state crypto profiles - draft-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile-00
- Re: nation state crypto profiles - draft-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile-00
- nation state crypto profiles - draft-jenkins-cnsa-cmc-profile-00
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-murchison-tzdist-tzif-14
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-softwire-yang-06.txt> (YANG Modules for IPv4-in-IPv6 Address plus Port Softwires) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Tsvart telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-16
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Enabling DMARC workaround code for all IETF/IRTF mailing lists
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Enabling DMARC workaround code for all IETF/IRTF mailing lists
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Genart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-org-ext-09
- RE: Opsdir last call review of draft-murchison-tzdist-tzif-14
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-murchison-tzdist-tzif-14
- Re: Diversity considerations
- RE: Opsdir last call review of draft-murchison-tzdist-tzif-14
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom)
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Anti-harassment policy [Was: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom)]
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom)
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom)
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-ccamp-mw-yang-09
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Diversity considerations
- From: Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-murchison-tzdist-tzif-14
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom)
- Re: [Taps] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-taps-minset-10
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-16
- Re: Personal Information in the IETF Datatracker
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Diversity considerations
- From: Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Diversity considerations
- RE: Tsvart telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-16
- RE: Iotdir early review of draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-10
- RE: Intdir early review of draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-10
- RE: Iotdir early review of draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-10
- RE: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-16
- From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-16
- Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom
- Re: Diversity considerations
- From: Padmadevi Pillay Esnault
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Fwd: General non-confidential input to NomCom
- RE: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-16
- From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: Personal Information in the IETF Datatracker
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-16
- RE: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-16
- From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom)
- Re: Diversity considerations
- From: Padmadevi Pillay Esnault
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom)
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Diversity considerations
- From: Padmadevi Pillay Esnault
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom)
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-16
- Re: Diversity considerations
- Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom
- RE: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-16
- From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: Personal Information in the IETF Datatracker
- Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04
- Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-13
- Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04
- Re: Personal Information in the IETF Datatracker
- Re: Personal Information in the IETF Datatracker
- Re: Personal Information in the IETF Datatracker
- Re: Personal Information in the IETF Datatracker
- Re: Personal Information in the IETF Datatracker
- Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom)
- Re: Personal Information in the IETF Datatracker
- Re: Personal Information in the IETF Datatracker
- Re: Fwd: General non-confidential input to NomCom
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-bcp-07.txt> (Network Time Protocol Best Current Practices) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Personal Information in the IETF Datatracker
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom)
- Re: Personal Information in the IETF Datatracker
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom)
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom)
- From: Riccardo Bernardini
- Re: Personal Information in the IETF Datatracker
- From: Marco Davids (Private)
- Re: Personal Information in the IETF Datatracker
- Re: Personal Information in the IETF Datatracker
- Re: Personal Information in the IETF Datatracker
- Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom)
- Diversity considerations (was: Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom)
- Re: Personal Information in the IETF Datatracker
- Re: Personal Information in the IETF Datatracker
- From: Riccardo Bernardini
- Re: Personal Information in the IETF Datatracker
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Personal Information in the IETF Datatracker
- Personal Information in the IETF Datatracker
- Re: Fwd: General non-confidential input to NomCom
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-bcp-07.txt> (Network Time Protocol Best Current Practices) to Best Current Practice
- Tsvart telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-16
- Opsdir last call review of draft-murchison-tzdist-tzif-14
- Re: Fwd: General non-confidential input to NomCom
- Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom
- Re: Fwd: General non-confidential input to NomCom
- Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom
- Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom
- Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom
- Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom
- Fwd: General non-confidential input to NomCom
- Re: [netmod] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-19
- From: Mahesh Jethanandani
- Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-19
- Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-16
- Re: Tsvart telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-19
- Iotdir early review of draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-10
- Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-10
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00.txt> (Update to the Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust) to Best Current Practice
- HotRFC @ IETF-103
- PechaKucha @ IETF-103
- Tsvart telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-19
- Intdir early review of draft-ietf-6lo-nfc-10
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00.txt> (Update to the Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust) to Best Current Practice
- Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00.txt> (Update to the Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [Taps] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-taps-minset-10
- RE: [Taps] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-taps-minset-10
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00.txt> (Update to the Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust) to Best Current Practice
- Last Call for Nominations for IETF Chair, IESG, and IAB Positions.
- Second Call for IETF LLC Board Director Nominations.
- Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf-06
- Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04
- Re: I-D Action: draft-klensin-iesg-rfc5742bis-01.txt
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: I-D Action: draft-klensin-iesg-rfc5742bis-01.txt
- Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-fix-04
- From: Francesca Palombini
- Re: I-D Action: draft-klensin-iesg-rfc5742bis-01.txt
- Re: [Taps] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-taps-minset-10
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00.txt> (Update to the Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust) to Best Current Practice
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-rationale-00.txt> (Discussion of the IASA 2.0 Changes as They Relate to the IETF Trust) to Informational RFC
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Mallory-in-the-middle attacks (Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs)
- Re: Iotdir early review of draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-02
- Re: [Iasa20] Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00.txt> (Update to the Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust) to Best Current Practice
- Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-architecture-08
- Re: Tell me if I should send this Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- From: lloyd . wood=40yahoo . co . uk
- Re: [Iasa20] Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00.txt> (Update to the Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust) to Best Current Practice
- Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-08
- Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-10
- Re: Mallory-in-the-middle attacks (Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs)
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: On-path attackers (Was: Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs)
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Mallory-in-the-middle attacks (Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs)
- Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ccamp-mw-yang-09
- Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-taps-minset-10
- Re: NomCom 2017: Call for nominations (IAOC mid-term replacement)
- Re: NomCom 2017: Call for nominations (IAOC mid-term replacement)
- Re: NomCom 2017: Call for nominations (IAOC mid-term replacement)
- Re: NomCom 2017: Call for nominations (IAOC mid-term replacement)
- Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-10
- Tell me if I should send this Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: NomCom 2017: Call for nominations (IAOC mid-term replacement)
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: NomCom 2017: Call for nominations (IAOC mid-term replacement)
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: NomCom 2017: Call for nominations (IAOC mid-term replacement)
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: On-path attackers (Was: Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs)
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: On-path attackers (Was: Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs)
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: On-path attackers (Was: Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs)
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: On-path attackers (Was: Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs)
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Tsvart telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-06
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: [nvo3] [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-vmm-04
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-05
- NomCom 2017: Call for nominations (IAOC mid-term replacement)
- On-path attackers (Was: Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs)
- Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00
- Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-05
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-05
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-18
- Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: ""Man-in-the-middle""? <was, Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs>
- Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- ""Man-in-the-middle""? <was, Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs>
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-05
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- RE: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-vmm-04
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- From: lloyd . wood=40yahoo . co . uk
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- From: lloyd . wood=40yahoo . co . uk
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- From: lloyd . wood=40yahoo . co . uk
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- RE: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- RE: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-05
- From: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- RE: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- From: Roberta Maglione (robmgl)
- SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- From: Anne-Marie Eklund-Löwinder
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- From: Riccardo Bernardini
- Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-05
- Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
- Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-05
- RE: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-05
- From: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-15
- Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-15
- Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-minset-10
- Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-13
- Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-vmm-04
- Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-vmm-04
- Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rlc-fec-scheme-07
- Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-13
- Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-fecframe-ext-04
- Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-fecframe-ext-04
- Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rlc-fec-scheme-07
- Iotdir early review of draft-ietf-6lo-deadline-time-02
- Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-vmm-04
- Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-vmm-04
- Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-05
- IETF procedures, the tradeoff between good sense and rule-following, and RFC 5742
- v3 format tools - issue discussion
- From: Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- RE: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-vmm-04
- Re: [Tzdist-bis] Last Call: <draft-murchison-tzdist-tzif-13.txt> (The Time Zone Information Format (TZif)) to Proposed Standard
- FW: Third Call for Nominations for IETF Chair, IESG, and IAB Positions.
- Re: Early Bird Registration Ends Today!
- Re: Early Bird Registration Ends Today!
- Re: Early Bird Registration Ends Today!
- Re: Early Bird Registration Ends Today!
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Early Bird Registration Ends Today!
- Re: Early Bird Registration Ends Today!
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Early Bird Registration Ends Today!
- RE: [Gen-art] [tram] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-09
- Re: [tram] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-09
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-07
- BOF proposals due Friday
- Re: [Softwires] Tsvart last call review ofdraft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast-22
- Re: Third Call for Nominations for IETF Chair, IESG, and IAB Positions.
- Re: [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-trammell-wire-image-04> (The Wire Image of a Network Protocol)
- Re: [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-trammell-wire-image-04> (The Wire Image of a Network Protocol)
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [103attendees] Update on IETF 103 visa information
- Re:[Softwires] Tsvart last call review ofdraft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast-22
- Re: [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-trammell-wire-image-04> (The Wire Image of a Network Protocol)
- Re: [103attendees] Update on IETF 103 visa information
- Re: [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-trammell-wire-image-04> (The Wire Image of a Network Protocol)
- Re: Update on IETF 103 visa information
- Re: [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-trammell-wire-image-04> (The Wire Image of a Network Protocol)
- From: Brian Trammell (IETF)
- Re: [103attendees] Update on IETF 103 visa information
- Re: [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-trammell-wire-image-04> (The Wire Image of a Network Protocol)
- Re: [103attendees] Update on IETF 103 visa information
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-07
- Re: [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-trammell-wire-image-04> (The Wire Image of a Network Protocol)
- Re: [103attendees] [103all] IETF 103 Letters of Invitation and THNIC documentation
- Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rlc-fec-scheme-07
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [103attendees] [103all] IETF 103 Letters of Invitation and THNIC documentation
- From: Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
- RE: [103all] IETF 103 Letters of Invitation and THNIC documentation
- From: Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- IETF 103 Letters of Invitation and THNIC documentation
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-15
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-15
- Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-fecframe-ext-04
- Re: Update on IETF 103 visa information
- Re: Update on IETF 103 visa information
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: CACAO
- Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-vmm-04
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-vmm-04
- Re: Update on IETF 103 visa information
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Update on IETF 103 visa information
- Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns-06
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- RE: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-vmm-04
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- RE: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-vmm-04
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Update on IETF 103 visa information
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: [Tzdist-bis] Last Call: <draft-murchison-tzdist-tzif-13.txt> (The Time Zone Information Format (TZif)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Update on IETF 103 visa information
- Re: Update on IETF 103 visa information
- Update on IETF 103 visa information
- Re: Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-expl-track-09
- From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: CACAO
- Re: [Tzdist-bis] Last Call: <draft-murchison-tzdist-tzif-13.txt> (The Time Zone Information Format (TZif)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: CACAO
- Re: Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-expl-track-09
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-frr-06
- Re: Last Call: <draft-murchison-tzdist-tzif-13.txt> (The Time Zone Information Format (TZif)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: CACAO
- Third Call for Nominations for IETF Chair, IESG, and IAB Positions.
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: CACAO
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: CACAO
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: CACAO
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: CACAO
- Re: meta-list (was Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: CACAO)
- Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-expl-track-09
- meta-list (was Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: CACAO)
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: CACAO
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: CACAO
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- From: Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [OPS-DIR] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-l2l3-vpn-mcast-mib-16
- From: Mahesh Jethanandani
- Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-l2l3-vpn-mcast-mib-16
- From: Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- From: Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- RE: [dhcwg] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-04
- Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-13
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-16
- IETF LLC Board Director Nominations are open!
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-13
- Re: Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-09.txt> (YANG Data Model for IEEE 1588-2008) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- RE: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-15
- From: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-15
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-15
- Re: Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-15
- Re: NomCom 2018: Call for nominations (2nd Call)
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-15
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-15
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-15
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-15
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-15
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header
- Re: [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-07
- From: Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-15
- Re: [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-07
- Re: Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-07
- Re: [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-trammell-wire-image-04> (The Wire Image of a Network Protocol)
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-09.txt> (YANG Data Model for IEEE 1588-2008) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [dhcwg] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-04
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-15
- RE: NomCom 2018: Call for nominations (2nd Call)
- Re: NomCom 2018: Call for nominations (2nd Call)
- Re: [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-trammell-wire-image-04> (The Wire Image of a Network Protocol)
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-15
- RE: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-vmm-04
- Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-15
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-09.txt> (YANG Data Model for IEEE 1588-2008) to Proposed Standard
- RE: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-09
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-09.txt> (YANG Data Model for IEEE 1588-2008) to Proposed Standard
- RE: [TICTOC] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-09
- Re: Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-07
- RE: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-09.txt> (YANG Data Model for IEEE 1588-2008) to Proposed Standard
- Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-09
- RE: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-09
- Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib-10
- Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-minset-08
- Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-minset-08
- Re: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-minset-08
- Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-minset-08
- Re: [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-trammell-wire-image-04> (The Wire Image of a Network Protocol)
- Re: IAB agendas now public
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Announcements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]