Re: Diversity considerations (was: Re: General non-confidential input to NomCom)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 10:37:06AM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Tomorrow I am speaking on Inclusion, Meritocracy & the Apache Way for
> ApacheCon in Montreal.
> 
> Any suggestions of things to help improve inclusion that would be good
> to add to my presso?
> 
> Something you think that would make it just a little easier for someone
> to join or lower a barrier to entry?

Trying to mix fun with hard analysis:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Hruska#Mediocrity

For Apache, would Mediocrity in a person count as a merit because it
represents an important part of the user basis, if not community,
or could it only be counted as an inclusion factor, or would that
factor be a sure aspect leading to exclusion and discrimination ?

In more boring words: Your presentation inclusion section does not answer hard
questions like "why would we not have natural diversity, and here is how
much of a problem exists" ? Does your org think it needs affirmative
action to fix it, and if so, why does it think that would
work ? Which of the inclusion factors really need to be considered
because we do not see natural diversity for it, and can it really be
effective ? How much does the capability to communicate in english
come into play - written?//verbal? ?  etc. pp.

I always have problems looking at boilerplate text about inclusion,
because to me it sounds like the promise to to explicitly do
something good - without ever stating what exactly that is, why it is
needed and why it can be efficient and effective.

I think its a lot easier to start rephrasing "do no evil against diversity":

- exclusion or discrimination due to (insert list)  is in
  violation of the community standards
- we reflect on our possible biases to minize acting on them.
  (insert good reading on self examining and avoidance of biases)

I think thats i think as much as anybody can promise to do towards
inclusion unless harder questions are being answered first and more
explicit inclusiveness action is well defined. 

Cheers
   Toerless

P.S.: Nice slides otherwise!


> Prelim slides at
> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1XnSiwPw2zQYcKhC80qmSjawpxtkYSUSOUXbm2Q7BOCo/edit#slide=id.g42d7232bcf_0_0
> 
> Regards,
> KAM

-- 
---
tte@xxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux