Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Anne-Marie Eklund-Löwinder <anne-marie.eklund-lowinder@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
From: Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:22:14 +0200
Cc: "ietf@xxxxxxxx Discussion" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Comments: In-reply-to Anne-Marie Eklund-Löwinder <anne-marie.eklund-lowinder@xxxxxx> message dated "Thu, 20 Sep 2018 12:09:06 -0000."
In-reply-to: <c755471a7f744fdd958759c6c5001147@exchange02.office.nic.se>
References: <cafa1282-ae6a-93de-ea4a-d100af28d8b8@digitaldissidents.org> <CAKHUCzxL8xgn2D2W9G=Qk=AXzyw4mmcqPii6GKBSiByRyxbq+Q@mail.gmail.com> <c755471a7f744fdd958759c6c5001147@exchange02.office.nic.se>

 Anne-Marie Eklund-Löwinder writes:

 > SKIP
 >
 > That said, I can't really see how the term "Man-in-the-middle" can be offensive.
 >

RFC 3761 (ENUM), 3833 (DNS), 6810 6811 8210 (RPKI), 7909 (RPSL)
uses about "monkey-in-the-middle".

PS. These are not related to "The Infinite Monkey Protocol Suite
(IMPS), RFC 2795.

	jaap

References:
- Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
  - From: Niels ten Oever
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
  - From: Dave Cridland
- SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
  - From: Anne-Marie Eklund-Löwinder

Prev by Date: RE: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
Next by Date: Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
Previous by thread: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
Next by thread: Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux