Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00.txt> (Update to the Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust) to Best Current Practice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I’ve heard this there is a little confusion about the timeline for appointments if this document is approved soon and the current NomCom is asked to seat trustees, so I’d like to suggest the following clarification:
> 
> OLD 
> The terms of the appointed trustees from IETF NomCom shall be three years.  The initial selection shall be one, two, and three year terms in order to initially stagger the terms and thus miminize potential annual Trustee turnover.  The other appointments by the IESG and the ISOC Board of Trustees shall be two year terms, with the initial terms being one and two years, respectively.
> 
> NEW 
> The terms of the appointed trustees from IETF NomCom shall be three years.  The initial selection shall be one, two, and three year terms in order to initially stagger the terms and thus miminize potential annual Trustee turnover.  The other appointments by the IESG and the ISOC Board of Trustees shall be two year terms, with the initial terms being one and two years, respectively. The term lengths of initial appointees should be measured from the First IETF of the year in which they are seated even if they are appointed after the First IETF of the year.

Sounds reasonable, and definitely clearer. Thanks.

Jari





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux