Hiya, On 13/09/18 03:37, Barry Leiba wrote: > This really should have come with a fuller description: I shouldn't > have to contact the list admins just to find out whether a new mailing > list ought to be on my radar or not. Yeah. And the archive's empty. And it uses the almost always meaningless prefix "cyber" over and over in many predictable (but meaningless) ways. There is a draft [1] though (from a pointer sent to the saag list). Mind you that includes this sentence: "Threat Actors and Intrusion Sets are constantly advancing at an increasing rate relative to cyber defense." So that's all bad signs IMO then (except for the existence of the draft.) I'm also a bit sad that we've gotten to the point where we're setting up lists driven to any extent by what's really an ill-defined marketing buzzword. OTOH, the goal according to [1] is an information model, so it could be mostly to totally harmless I guess;-) Only other thing to note is that this happens so often (new list for who knows what) that maybe the tooling's a bit wrong and encourages folks to ok or ask for lists without considering that others don't have the same (or any) context. Cheers, S. [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jordan-cacao-introduction-00 > > Barry > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 4:58 PM, IETF Secretariat > <ietf-secretariat@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> A new IETF non-working group email list has been created. >> >> List address: cacao@xxxxxxxx >> Archive: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cacao/ >> To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cacao >> >> Purpose: >> This email list will be used to discuss Collaborative Automated Course of >> Action Operations (CACAO) for Cyber Security >> >> For additional information, please contact the list administrators. >> > >
Attachment:
0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
