https://www.ietf.org/contact/ombudsteam/ http://www.olddog.co.uk/anti-harassment-process.htm Started out as anti-harrassment, not sure if they make a line re diversity based discrimination, but best to touch base with them to learn more about the IETF processes. ADs are also most often the first line of reporting confidential issues. I'd think ombutsteam might be a good place to ask if/what explicit confidentiality processes IETF has about that. Given how this is the IETF we might even have even more RFCs about it than what's on the above URLs. Cheers Toerless On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 05:18:34PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > On 9/26/2018 6:54 PM, Toerless Eckert wrote: > > A more efficient way to get more insight is to ask > > the community to file explicit bug reports re. diversity/inclusion. > > Ideally with a suggested patch in pseudocode that is detailled enough > > for review of effectiveness and efficiency. > > > > I was just quickly looking and couldn't find something: Does Apache > > have well defined/documented methods to report these type of issues > > confidentially ? ombutsteam, specific confidentiality expectations > > against specific roles in the community, etc. pp. ? Aka: work out > > the most important organizational prerequites that allow you to > > determine, review and fix the top actually concerning diversity/inclusion > > issues. > > We don't have it. Thanks for the feedback. This is a good idea.
