Re: why exactly is HRPC for, was Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for sharing the draft list, Melinda.  I'm also adding the chairs in case they want to chime in.  There
is some work in planning that hasn't been drafted yet.

I think that people should not consider this discussion on IETF discuss as a representation of the group. 
I support the general discussion, but the HRPC work is extensive, and there's no good reason to discuss it
at length outside of its own mailing list (subscription link:  https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc)

Finally, if anyone wants to start drafts on Human Rights articles not already tackled, that door is open.

Allison

On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 22:30, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 9/20/18 6:10 PM, Mark Rousell wrote:
> On 21/09/2018 00:34, John Levine wrote:
>> There are real human rights problems that HRPC could engage with, but
>> don't.  They need to make up their mind whether they're serious.
> Well said.

Here's the current list of drafts, plus some contributions
that haven't been adopted by the RG:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/rg/hrpc/documents/

Melinda


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux