Thanks Brian. Consider it changed in the -20. Dino > On Sep 25, 2018, at 2:26 AM, Brian Trammell <ietf@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Brian Trammell > Review result: Ready with Nits > > Thanks for the revisions. Following up on my previous tsvart review, there is > one remaining nit from previous transport reviews: > > - Section 5.3, the list "When doing ITR/PITR encapsulation", third item needs a > citation fix: > > OLD: > > The 'Explicit Congestion Notification' (ECN) field (bits 6 and 7 > of the IPv6 'Traffic Class' field) requires special treatment in > order to avoid discarding indications of congestion [RFC3168]. > > NEW: > > The 'Explicit Congestion Notification' (ECN) field (bits 6 and 7 > of the IPv6 'Traffic Class' field) requires special treatment in > order to avoid discarding indications of congestion [RFC6040]. > > Thanks, cheers, > > Brian > >
