Re: On-path attackers (Was: Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: On-path attackers (Was: Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs)
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 08:25:13 +1200
In-reply-to: <503900CC-CC68-48A7-91E9-4C73DD9C7B51@fugue.com>
References: <cafa1282-ae6a-93de-ea4a-d100af28d8b8@digitaldissidents.org> <CAKHUCzxL8xgn2D2W9G=Qk=AXzyw4mmcqPii6GKBSiByRyxbq+Q@mail.gmail.com> <c755471a7f744fdd958759c6c5001147@exchange02.office.nic.se> <20180920170939.GA68853@isc.org> <968547d5-7e96-5c31-69a3-20456baccf1a@comcast.net> <8EF9ACE5-7D4C-4511-B9B0-FDAE121FF2B6@tzi.org> <20180920194622.GB69847@isc.org> <7DF0DC82-B40A-441F-BFB0-78490121E530@piuha.net> <CAHbuEH5pPGaEjx=r68DDBndsqMV_4jDmL95=8Lkdkabmz5Xa4w@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4+nEEWDM0jem7knoYDs9A5fM5M=_vbtSNOkLhi57_x2mq4+A@mail.gmail.com> <503900CC-CC68-48A7-91E9-4C73DD9C7B51@fugue.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1

I am a man. I do not object to the phrase "man-in-the-middle".

Could we stop this discussion now please? We can all easily agree
to avoid offensive language, and we have plentiful document review
processes to assist in this.

Regards
   Brian Carpenter

References:
- Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
  - From: Niels ten Oever
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
  - From: Dave Cridland
- SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
  - From: Anne-Marie Eklund-Löwinder
- Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
  - From: Evan Hunt
- Re: SV: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
  - From: Michael StJohns
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
  - From: Carsten Bormann
- Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
  - From: Evan Hunt
- On-path attackers (Was: Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs)
  - From: Jari Arkko
- Re: On-path attackers (Was: Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs)
  - From: Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: On-path attackers (Was: Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs)
  - From: Donald Eastlake
- Re: On-path attackers (Was: Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs)
  - From: Ted Lemon

Prev by Date: Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
Next by Date: Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
Previous by thread: Re: On-path attackers (Was: Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs)
Next by thread: Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]