I had thought we had discussed sufficient edits. When I looked at the
diff, what I saw helped some, but still left me concerned.
Yours,
Joel
On 10/4/18 6:06 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Hi,
Joel Halpern <jmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-??
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 2018-10-03
IETF LC End Date: 2018-06-29
IESG Telechat date: 2018-10-11
Summary: This document seems to meet the specific requirements for publication
as a proposed standard.
Major issues:
It is still this reviewer's opinion that for a reader who has not been
involved in the discussion in the working group, the document is quite
unclear and confusing. For somewhat more details, please see my previous
review at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-10-genart-lc-halpern-2018-06-28/
I'm sorry to hear that you find it confusing. I was under the
impression that the edits that we made after your previous review were
sufficient.
/martin
Minor issues:
N/A
Nits/editorial comments:
N/A
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
