Dear Joe,
Thank you very much for your comments, the following is the response,
> The doc does the right thing by not trying to describe a solution
> itself. However, it cites RFC 5565, which cites RFC4459. That's where
> the only trouble lies - 4459 is incorrect, as noted in
> draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels. I might suggest they continue to cite RFC
> 5565 but indicate that the requirements for tunneling are under current
> revision and cite draft-ietf-intarea-tunnel (at least informationally) too.
> It might also be important to discuss the challenge of tunnel
> configuration in a multicast environment, which is addressed as well in
> draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels.
> - other issues:
> 7.2 correctly notes that the TTL should be set per tunneling policy, but
> gives no advice as to how that is done (again, a pointer to
> draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels would be useful)
Thank you for your useful advices, we add draft-ietf-intarea-tunnel as a reference
for fragment technology and ttl configuration.
We have uploaded a new version: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast-23
Best Regards,
Shu Yang
------------------
Review result: Ready with Issues
Hi, all,
I’ve prepared this review the request of Magnus Westerlund, who is preparing a
TSVART review. My comments focus on the issue of fragmentation and tunneling.
These are relatively minor issues that are simple to address, but not quite
what I would consider nits.
Joe
------
-- Regarding fragmentation:
The doc does the right thing by not trying to describe a solution
itself. However, it cites RFC 5565, which cites RFC4459. That's where
the only trouble lies - 4459 is incorrect, as noted in
draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels. I might suggest they continue to cite RFC
5565 but indicate that the requirements for tunneling are under current
revision and cite draft-ietf-intarea-tunnel (at least informationally) too.
It might also be important to discuss the challenge of tunnel
configuration in a multicast environment, which is addressed as well in
draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels.
- other issues:
7.2 correctly notes that the TTL should be set per tunneling policy, but
gives no advice as to how that is done (again, a pointer to
draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels would be useful)
------
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires