Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the use of the “Updates” header

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/12/2018 4:45 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
...
The specific reasons that a given RFC updates another should be described near the top of the Introduction section of the new RFC, possibly in its own sub-section. This text should contain enough detail to help readers who are familiar with the specification that is being updated to decide if they need to read the rest of this newer RFC. This text must contain enough detail for readers to fully understand the nature of the update.
...

Yes.

....or maybe move that information into a later section/appendix, and refer to that from the introduction.

Best regards, Julian




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux