Paul Wouters <paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I do not agree the thread came to that conclusion. I see people > disagreed and stop the discussion, because everyone agreed the > draft in question to make Suite B historic was not disputed. > People outside the IETF do not understand the subtleties of different > IETF streams, and having an RFC is seen as a stamp of approval of > the international community. Therefore, I do indeed believe we should > not make the same mistake again. I agree with Paul. Further, it makes it look like the NSA has a priviledged position, particularly when it writes things the way it did. > The USG seems to be doing a fine job making FIPS publications available > without these being enshrined in RFCs. > I am against the IETF publishing CNSA or any other nation state > cryptography profiles. As am I. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature