IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Apr 18 06:00:02 2021
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
- Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: New-comers)
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
- Re: New-comers
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- RE: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
- San Francisco?
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
- RE: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
- RE: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
- Re: New-comers
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dprive-xfr-over-tls-09
- From: Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
- Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
- Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
- Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
- Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: New-comers
- Re: New-comers
- New-comers
- RE: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- RE: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: motivation to "join" IETF (was: the old fellowship program)
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: [Last-Call] [Iot-directorate] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
- Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
- New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- RE: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Proposed Process to Conduct Assessment Activity of IETF Administrative Support Activity
- From: IETF Administration LLC Board of Directors Chair
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-11
- From: Christer Holmberg via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10
- motivation to "join" IETF (was: the old fellowship program)
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [Last-Call] [Iot-directorate] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10
- From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10
- From: Peter Van der Stok via Datatracker
- RE: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: [Last-Call] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-crocker-inreply-react-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-17
- From: Francesca Palombini
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-06
- From: Martin Björklund via Datatracker
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang-09
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-11
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: [Last-Call] [OPSEC] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-25
- Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: [Last-Call] Last-call comments on OAM in SRv6 draft
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-qos-model-03
- From: Jürgen Schönwälder via Datatracker
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-spring-srv6-oam-09.txt> (Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) in Segment Routing Networks with IPv6 Data plane (SRv6)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10
- From: Tero Kivinen via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-09
- From: Ron Bonica via Datatracker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
- Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06
- From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-interleaved-modes-04.txt> (NTP Interleaved Modes) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-09.txt> (YANG Data Model for Babel) to Proposed Standard
- [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server-06
- From: Ladislav Lhotka via Datatracker
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality (was: Re: Quic: the elephant in the room)
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality (was: Re: Quic: the elephant in the room)
- DNSSEC architecture vs reality (was: Re: Quic: the elephant in the room)
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-interleaved-modes-04.txt> (NTP Interleaved Modes) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- [ot] Fwd: [ann] publictext
- Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Apr 11 06:00:02 2021
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- From: lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: DNS vs PKI, was Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: [Last-Call] [OPSEC] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-25
- Re: DNS vs PKI, was Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: media casting cluster*
- Quic: the elephant in the room
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-6man-spring-srv6-oam-10
- From: Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-06
- [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server-09
- From: Ladislav Lhotka via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-core-sid-15
- Re: [Last-Call] secdir review of draft-ietf-6man-spring-srv6-oam
- Re: [Last-Call] Last-call comments on OAM in SRv6 draft
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-spring-srv6-oam-09.txt> (Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) in Segment Routing Networks with IPv6 Data plane (SRv6)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-spring-srv6-oam-09
- [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-access-token-jwt-12
- From: Joseph Salowey via Datatracker
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- [Last-Call] secdir review of draft-ietf-6man-spring-srv6-oam
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
- Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
- Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06
- From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-interleaved-modes-04
- Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
- Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
- Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
- Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
- From: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
- Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
- Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
- Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
- Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
- Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
- Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
- Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
- Re: media casting cluster*
- Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
- IETF Annual Report 2020
- From: IETF Administration LLC Board of Directors Chair
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
- Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
- Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
- From: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [admin-discuss] IETF LLC Statement on OFAC Compliance Questions
- Re: Fwd: Initial suggestion from the IETF SAA
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-interleaved-modes-04.txt> (NTP Interleaved Modes) to Proposed Standard
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-25
- From: Tim Chown via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Antw: [EXT] Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-interleaved-modes-04.txt> (NTP Interleaved Modes) to Proposed Standard
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [admin-discuss] IETF LLC Statement on OFAC Compliance Questions
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-interleaved-modes-04
- From: Theresa Enghardt via Datatracker
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator-14
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-06
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator-14
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-interleaved-modes-04.txt> (NTP Interleaved Modes) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Fwd: Initial suggestion from the IETF SAA
- Re: Fwd: Initial suggestion from the IETF SAA
- Re: Fwd: Initial suggestion from the IETF SAA
- Re: [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-06
- [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-06
- From: Ines Robles via Datatracker
- Re: Fwd: Initial suggestion from the IETF SAA
- Re: Fwd: Initial suggestion from the IETF SAA
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: Fwd: Initial suggestion from the IETF SAA
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: Fwd: Initial suggestion from the IETF SAA
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-04
- Re: Fwd: Initial suggestion from the IETF SAA
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-20
- Re: Fwd: Initial suggestion from the IETF SAA
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-30
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-05
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-crmf-update-algs-04
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib-10
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-06
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-09
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-access-token-jwt-11
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator-13
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Fwd: Initial suggestion from the IETF SAA
- From: IETF Sergeant at Arms
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-11
- From: Dale Worley via Datatracker
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib-10
- From: Tim Evens (tievens)
- [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common-06
- From: Ron Bonica via Datatracker
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- From: lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- April 1st RFCs (was Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work)
- Re: TERM chartering and the April incidents
- Re: TERM chartering and the April incidents
- Re: TERM chartering and the April incidents
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- TERM chartering and the April incidents
- From: lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Apr 4 06:00:04 2021
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-oam-req-frmwk-07
- From: Melinda Shore via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-11
- From: Al Morton via Datatracker
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- RE: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- RE: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator-14
- From: Yaron Sheffer via Datatracker
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-09
- From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-09
- From: Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common-06
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: [Last-Call] [Lwip] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-03
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-24
- Re: [Terminology] A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- Re: [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-24
- From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-07
- From: Russ Housley via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common-06
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
- A contribution to ongoing terminology work
- From: lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common-06
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-spring-srv6-oam-09
- Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06
- From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Two verified errata for BCP79
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-09
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-09
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-09
- Re: [Last-Call] [Lwip] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-03
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-09
- [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common-06
- From: Wesley Eddy via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-05.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) Tags for Object Identifiers) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib-10
- Re: Propose opensource standard for a PDL (printer driver)
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-09
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-05.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) Tags for Object Identifiers) to Proposed Standard
- From: Francesca Palombini
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib-10
- From: Tim Evens (tievens)
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib-10
- From: Chris Lonvick via Datatracker
- RE: Propose opensource standard for a PDL (printer driver)
- Re: Propose opensource standard for a PDL (printer driver)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: is last-call working the way the IESG intended?
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-09
- Re: is last-call working the way the IESG intended?
- Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common-06
- Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-07
- Propose opensource standard for a PDL (printer driver)
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-09
- [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-07
- From: Radek Krejčí via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common-06
- From: Radek Krejčí via Datatracker
- Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Mar 28 06:00:02 2021
- Re: [Last-Call] SECDIR Review draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-05
- [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-03
- From: Nancy Cam-Winget via Datatracker
- Re: media casting cluster*
- Re: media casting cluster*
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-crmf-update-algs-04
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-crmf-update-algs-04
- Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-core-sid-15
- From: Francesca Palombini
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-tnauthlist-07
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-tnauthlist-07
- Re: Gather.town hour every month?
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-crmf-update-algs-04
- From: Ines Robles via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [EXTERNAL] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-13
- [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-core-sid-15
- From: Xufeng Liu via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-tnauthlist-07
- From: Nancy Cam-Winget via Datatracker
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- Re: [Last-Call] [Acme] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-06
- Re: [Last-Call] [Acme] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-06
- Re: [Last-Call] [Acme] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-06
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- Re: [Last-Call] [Acme] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-06
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-06
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-06
- From: Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- Re: [Last-Call] [Acme] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-06
- Re: [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-24
- From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-dtls13-41
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-11
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-17
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-13
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] [tcpm] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-2140bis-09
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry-04
- LLC Board Strategic Retreat Day Two Webex Link
- From: IETF Administration LLC Board of Directors Chair
- Re: IETF LLC Statement on OFAC Compliance Questions
- IETF LLC Statement on OFAC Compliance Questions
- From: IETF Administration LLC Board of Directors Chair
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- [Last-Call] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params-13
- From: Elwyn Davies via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-17
- From: Elwyn Davies via Datatracker
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- Re: rfc791 coming up to 40 years ... what to do (remember, celebrate, ...?)
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06
- From: Andy Bierman via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [RTG-DIR] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-24
- [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-24
- From: Acee Lindem via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-dtls-authorize-16
- From: Russ Mundy via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] SECDIR Review draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-05
- Re: [Last-Call] [Acme] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-06
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-05
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-06
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-port-randomization-06
- [Last-Call] SECDIR Review draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-05
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-05
- From: Dale Worley via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [OAUTH-WG] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-30
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-06
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-09
- From: Tero Kivinen via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-05
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-05
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang-09
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-05
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-05
- [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-12
- From: Carlos Bernardos via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-05
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Announcements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]