Hi Yaron,
thanks for your comments I'll address them in the next version of the
document.
thanks,
Peter
On 03/05/2021 14:56, Yaron Sheffer via Datatracker wrote:
Reviewer: Yaron Sheffer
Review result: Ready
This document specifies extensions (TLVs, sub-TLVs etc.) to IS-IS in support of
Segment Routing on IPv6.
The document states that the security considerations are a union of security
considerations from a bunch of predecessor document. This seems reasonable to
me.
Details:
* The first sentence of the Abstract is missing a word, perhaps "architecture".
* Introduction: typo: "This documents".
* Capabilities: to allow for future extensibility, you should probably add
"Implementations receiving this TLV MUST ignore any other bits that may be set
in the Flags field".
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
