--On Saturday, April 24, 2021 14:33 -0700 Pete Resnick via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Reviewer: Pete Resnick > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General > Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being > processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these > comments just like any other last call comments. >... > Nits/editorial comments: > > In section 4.3: > > In several response code definitions: > > The token used MUST be any token that was received in a > request using the same Request-Tag. > > That doesn't really parse well. I think you either mean "The > token used MUST be a token" or you mean "The token used can be > any token". If the first meaning is intended, isn't that tautologically true? If the token used is not a token, what would it be? john -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
