On 24 Apr 2021, at 17:38, John C Klensin wrote:
--On Saturday, April 24, 2021 14:33 -0700 Pete Resnick via
Datatracker noreply@xxxxxxxx wrote:Reviewer: Pete Resnick
Review result: Ready with IssuesI am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General
Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being
processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these
comments just like any other last call comments.
...Nits/editorial comments:
In section 4.3:
In several response code definitions:
The token used MUST be any token that was received in a
request using the same Request-Tag.That doesn't really parse well. I think you either mean "The
token used MUST be a token" or you mean "The token used can be
any token".If the first meaning is intended, isn't that tautologically
true? If the token used is not a token, what would it be?
You need to put it in the context of the example give. It could be:
The token used MUST be a token that was received in a
request using the same Request-Tag.
which means it can't be a token with a different Request-Tag, or it could be:
The token used can be any token that was received in a
request using the same Request-Tag.
which means that there might be different tokens that use the same Request-Tag, but you can use any of them.
pr
--
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
