On 4/27/21 9:19 AM, Lars Eggert wrote:
Hi,
On 2021-4-27, at 16:13, Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've seen too many groups decide to "adopt" a draft, with little discussion, based only on the appearance of support for the draft by the chairs, when it was clear that most participants (even those in favor of adoption) hadn't even read it.
would you please provide some examples?
I don't want to single out specific WGs, especially when these decisions
were taken some time ago and it's too late to change them. Also it's
not as if I've kept a record of every time I have seen this happen.
I've just seen it happen so often that I realized it was poor practice
on our part, and I don't think it should be further entrenched.
Keith
