RE: New Approach For Discussing IPng

[Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

YES, same concept as GRE.

 

Khaled Omar

 

From: Christopher Morrow [mailto:morrowc.lists@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 4:09 PM
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tom Beecher <beecher@xxxxxxxxxx>; Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@xxxxxxxx>; Lloyd W <lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: New Approach For Discussing IPng

 

 

 

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 9:53 AM Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Tom,

 

>> That would be an accurate description of tunnel mode IPSEC. If that is what you are proposing, numerous v4/v6 tunneling standards are already defined and are well developed.

 

I’m not asking for an IPSec tunnel, I’m proposing something like that tunnel when it adds another header with different source and destination addresses.

 

 

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2890

 

Once that will be accomplished, then peacefully IPv4 and IPv6 can coexist and communicate.

 

 

all done.