Keith, you seem to be4 asking for a change in established practice. You
apparently don't like the practice.
If you want it changed, you need to make an argument, get support, etc.
Objecting to a proposal because you want something else to be different
seems rather odd.
Yours,
Joel
On 4/27/2021 11:34 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
On 4/27/21 11:06 AM, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
I disagree. WGs have charters, which result in RFCs. During that
process, they have consensus-based working drafts that are refined to
meet their charter goals. That's an "adopted" draft. But it doesn't
have to be based on a single individual draft, a working draft can be
the result of merging earlier individual drafts, or can even originate
as a WG draft without a preceding individual draft or drafts. But yes,
working drafts do reflect WG consensus, and they have formal standing
as such.
emphatically disagree, and as said earlier I believe it is a Bad Idea to
give such draft more status than they deserve.
Keith
