Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Does the IESG plan to catch up on old reported errata that have never been processed?
> There are three here for example:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/rfc6275, as much as 4 years
> old. There may be a lot more lurking.
We need to fix the tooling to delegate to WG chairs to propose actions.
Maybe we want ADs to confirm (like milestones), but I don't think we'll ever
deal with backlog until we can easily keep up with current efforts.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
