You have been told several times, by several people, that a draft is not a standard. No matter what vendors do, no matter what emails say about it. Even if the subject of the document says “A Standard BLS Mechanism,” until it is an RFC
it is not a standard. People within the IETF often use the word standard in a number of ways. That doesn’t mean the document IS a standard. I unmderstand this is frustrating to you, but just because some vendors implemented a draft, and you found a bug, that doesn’t mean the draft authors have to push out an update immediately. There is a reason, after all, why the document
is called a *draft* |
