Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/19/21 10:31 AM, Masataka Ohta wrote:

> The sample is too small and not
> representative of the US population.

"too small"?

You lack expertise in statistics.
That is undoubtedly true.   And yet, the sample of NYT comments is still far too small to represent the US population.
In this case of so obvious lack of support for TERM, sample size
of 100 is enough as the proof regardless of US population, even
when there is some bias to choose representatives.

I wasn't addressing TERM.   But I think it's fair to say that several IETF participants regard TERM as problematic at least.

Keith





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux