RE: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.

[Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

>> The same IPv10 whose drafts you previously wanted removing from the drafts repository?

 

And regarding this question, yes, same draft.

 

From: Lloyd W [mailto:lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2021 12:44 AM
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.

 

Khaled

 

The same IPv10 whose drafts you previously wanted removing from the drafts repository?

 

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/7pc66r2Kf83BfaHW4ZWIK9GfcBk/

that does not encourage others to look at your drafts.

 

Lloyd Wood

lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx

On 17 Apr 2021, at 03:29, Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Dear IETFers,

 

I hope you are all fine,

 

I still see through my online research that the world still working on IPv4 and the migration to IPv6 will take longer than expected due to the slow movement towards IPv6.

 

We still have the opportunity here to discuss more transitioning solutions and I think I suggested one (IPv10 or IPmix) to help in solving this migration issue under the new administration of the IETF.

 

Best Regards,

 

Khaled Omar

Senior Network and Security Engineer

Mobile ): (EGY) (+2)-01003620284

E-mail *:    eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx

Connect with me:

Twitter

LinkedIn