IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-10
  • From: Lars Eggert
• [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-14
  • From: Magnus Nystrom via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-02
  • From: Joel Halpern Direct
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-02
  • From: Ladislav Lhotka
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-08
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-09
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-10
  • From: Gyan Mishra
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-10
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-09.txt> (YANG Data Model for Babel) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mahesh Jethanandani
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl-04
  • From: Sheng Jiang via Datatracker
• Remove me from the distribution list
  • From: LAM, Sai-Hung
• Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun May 16 06:00:02 2021
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-09.txt> (YANG Data Model for Babel) to Proposed Standard
  • From: tom petch
• Re: [Last-Call] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-08
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [Last-Call] [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-10
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• [Last-Call] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-08
  • From: Jean-Michel Combes via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-emu-eap-noob-04
  • From: David Schinazi via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-02
  • From: Joel Halpern via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-09.txt> (YANG Data Model for Babel) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mahesh Jethanandani
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-09.txt> (YANG Data Model for Babel) to Proposed Standard
  • From: tom petch
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-09.txt> (YANG Data Model for Babel) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mahesh Jethanandani
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-02
  • From: Ladislav Lhotka
• [Last-Call] secdir review of draft-ietf-stir-cert-delegation-04
  • From: Carl Wallace
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-09.txt> (YANG Data Model for Babel) to Proposed Standard
  • From: tom petch
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-02
  • From: Valery Smyslov via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-16
  • From: Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker
• Final reminder - annual IETF community survey
  • From: IETF Executive Director
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-payload-vp9-13
  • From: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-09.txt> (YANG Data Model for Babel) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Mahesh Jethanandani
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: tom petch
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: [Last-Call] [bess] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-05
  • From: Gyan Mishra
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: [Last-Call] [bess] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-05
  • From: Gyan Mishra
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rats-yang-tpm-charra-07
  • From: Eric Voit (evoit)
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Last-Call] [bess] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-05
  • From: Leonard Giuliano
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: [Last-Call] [bess] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-05
  • From: Gyan Mishra
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Lloyd W
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Alvaro Retana
• Re: Please share your views in our first annual IETF community survey
  • From: tom petch
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: [Last-Call] [bess] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-05
  • From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix-14
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: StandICT.eu funding on offer
  • From: Vittorio Bertola
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Lloyd W
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: otroan
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: tom petch
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-senml-versions-02
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: NomCom Chair 2021-2022
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: Reminder: IETF 111 Birds of a Feather (BOF) proposals requested by 28 May
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• Re: Please share your views in our first annual IETF community survey
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rats-yang-tpm-charra-07
  • From: Mahesh Jethanandani via Datatracker
• Re: IETF 111 schedule update
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: IETF 111 schedule update
  • From: Tim Chown
• Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun May 9 06:00:02 2021
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: StandICT.eu funding on offer
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: StandICT.eu funding on offer
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: StandICT.eu funding on offer
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: StandICT.eu funding on offer
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: StandICT.eu funding on offer
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: StandICT.eu funding on offer
  • From: Amelia Andersdotter
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• Re: NomCom Chair 2021-2022
  • From: Lloyd W
• Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Reminder: IETF 111 Birds of a Feather (BOF) proposals requested by 28 May
  • From: Lloyd W
• Re: StandICT.eu funding on offer
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix-14
  • From: Gunnar Hellström
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix-14
  • From: Gunnar Hellström
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix-14
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix-14
  • From: Peter Yee
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix-14
  • From: Gunnar Hellström
• Re: [Last-Call] [AVTCORE] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix-16
  • From: Gunnar Hellström
• Re: Reminder: IETF 111 Birds of a Feather (BOF) proposals requested by 28 May
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: Reminder: IETF 111 Birds of a Feather (BOF) proposals requested by 28 May
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] [bess] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-05
  • From: Gyan Mishra
• Re: StandICT.eu funding on offer
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Reminder: IETF 111 Birds of a Feather (BOF) proposals requested by 28 May
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• RE: NomCom Chair 2021-2022
  • From: g_e_montenegro=40yahoo . com
• Re: [Last-Call] [AVTCORE] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix-16
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: [Last-Call] [AVTCORE] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-jpegxs-12
  • From: Tim Bruylants
• Re: [Last-Call] [AVTCORE] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix-16
  • From: Gunnar Hellström
• Re: StandICT.eu funding on offer
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: StandICT.eu funding on offer
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: StandICT.eu funding on offer
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: StandICT.eu funding on offer
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: [Last-Call] [AVTCORE] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-jpegxs-12
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: Please share your views in our first annual IETF community survey
  • From: tom petch
• Re: Please share your views in our first annual IETF community survey
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• Re: StandICT.eu funding on offer
  • From: Vittorio Bertola
• Reminder: IETF 111 Birds of a Feather (BOF) proposals requested by 28 May
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Please share your views in our first annual IETF community survey
  • From: Jared Mauch
• IETF 111 schedule update
  • From: IETF Chair
• Re: Please share your views in our first annual IETF community survey
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: Please share your views in our first annual IETF community survey
  • From: tom petch
• Please share your views in our first annual IETF community survey
  • From: IETF Executive Director
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-09
  • From: Mahesh Jethanandani
• Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-09
  • From: Mahesh Jethanandani
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix-14
  • From: Gunnar Hellström
• Re: StandICT.eu funding on offer
  • From: Jay Daley
• StandICT.eu funding on offer
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-05
  • From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
• Re: [Last-Call] [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-06
  • From: Warren Kumari
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-jpegxs-12
  • From: Russ Housley via Datatracker
• Re: NomCom Chair 2021-2022
  • From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix-16
  • From: Rich Salz via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [OPSAWG] [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-06
  • From: Robert Kisteleki
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix-14
  • From: Peter Yee via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-06
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [Last-Call] [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-06
  • From: Kyle Rose
• Re: [Last-Call] [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-06
  • From: Kyle Rose
• Re: [Last-Call] [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-06
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [Last-Call] [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-06
  • From: Randy Bush
• [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-13
  • From: Ron Bonica via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-06
  • From: Kyle Rose
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-new-block-10
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] [TLS] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate-04
  • From: Daniel Migault
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-06
  • From: Randy Bush
• DINRG Workshop (Interim Meeting) on the Centralization in the Internet
  • From: Dirk Kutscher
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-09
  • From: Stewart Bryant via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [TLS] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate-04
  • From: Sean Turner
• NomCom Chair 2021-2022
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-08
  • From: Stefan Santesson via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-14
  • From: Peter Psenak
• Re: [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-core-new-block-11
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-senml-versions-02
  • From: Elwyn Davies via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-08
  • From: Ron Bonica via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-06
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [Last-Call] [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-06
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: [Last-Call] [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-06
  • From: Kyle Rose
• Re: [Last-Call] [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-06
  • From: Russ Housley
• [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-core-new-block-11
  • From: Emmanuel Baccelli via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-06
  • From: Kyle Rose
• Re: [Last-Call] [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-06
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-06
  • From: Kyle Rose
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-14
  • From: Yaron Sheffer via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [EXT] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-qos-model-03
  • From: Aseem Choudhary (asechoud)
• Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun May 2 06:00:02 2021
  • From: John Levine
• [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-09
  • From: Radek Krejčí via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-core-senml-versions-02
  • From: Joseph Salowey via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-05
  • From: Qin Wu
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-05
  • From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-05
  • From: Qin Wu
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-05
  • From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-05
  • From: Qin Wu
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dprive-xfr-over-tls-09
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-core-new-block-11
  • From: Colin Perkins
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-core-new-block-11
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-core-new-block-11
  • From: Colin Perkins
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-06
  • From: Randy Bush
• Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06
  • From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
• Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06
  • From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-06
  • From: Kyle Rose via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-core-new-block-11
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: S Moonesamy
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-10
  • From: Gyan Mishra via Datatracker
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-core-new-block-11
  • From: Colin Perkins via Datatracker
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: tom petch
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-05
  • From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• RE: Status of this memo
  • From: Gorman, Pierce
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: [Last-Call] [AVTCORE] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix-14
  • From: Gunnar Hellström
• Re: [Last-Call] [AVTCORE] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix-14
  • From: Gunnar Hellström
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Lloyd W
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-new-block-10
  • From: Francesca Palombini
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Lloyd W
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-new-block-10
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-05
  • From: Qin Wu
• Re: Status of this memo [WG consensus]
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: Status of this memo [NOTE WELL]
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Status of this memo [name remixing]
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Scott Bradner
• Re: Status of this memo [name remixing]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Status of this memo [WG consensus]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo [NOTE WELL]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-new-block-10
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Martin Vigoureux
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Michael StJohns
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Martin Vigoureux
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-08
  • From: Christian Hopps
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-05
  • From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: Status of this memo
  • From: Michael McBride
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-10
  • From: Daniel Migault via Datatracker
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Martin Vigoureux
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Scott Bradner
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Vittorio Bertola
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Lloyd W
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix-14
  • From: Jürgen Schönwälder via Datatracker
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Vittorio Bertola
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-05
  • From: Qin Wu
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Status of this memo
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-08
  • From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
• Re: Escalation: time commitment to fix *production* security bugs for BLS RFC v4?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-05
  • From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
• BitCoin delenda est Was: Escalation: time commitment to fix *production* security bugs for BLS RFC v4?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Escalation: time commitment to fix *production* security bugs for BLS RFC v4?
  • From: Quan Thoi Minh Nguyen
• Re: Escalation: time commitment to fix *production* security bugs for BLS RFC v4?
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: Escalation: time commitment to fix *production* security bugs for BLS RFC v4?
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: Escalation: time commitment to fix *production* security bugs for BLS RFC v4?
  • From: Quan Thoi Minh Nguyen
• Re: Escalation: time commitment to fix *production* security bugs for BLS RFC v4?
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: Escalation: time commitment to fix *production* security bugs for BLS RFC v4?
  • From: Quan Thoi Minh Nguyen
• Re: Escalation: time commitment to fix *production* security bugs for BLS RFC v4?
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Fwd: Escalation: time commitment to fix *production* security bugs for BLS RFC v4?
  • From: Quan Thoi Minh Nguyen
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-new-block-10
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-06
  • From: tom petch
• Re: L3 RFC draft help
  • From: Aqua Q Glass
• Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Apr 25 06:00:02 2021
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-new-block-10
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-new-block-10
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-new-block-10
  • From: John C Klensin
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-new-block-10
  • From: Pete Resnick via Datatracker
• RE: Anyone know who the ISE is?
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Anyone know who the ISE is?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Anyone know who the ISE is?
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Anyone know who the ISE is?
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Test - please ignore
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-06
  • From: Yingzhen Qu
• Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-06
  • From: Acee Lindem (acee)
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: Salz, Rich
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-05
  • From: Qin Wu via Datatracker
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Ben Laurie
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: tom petch
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: tom petch
• Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-06
  • From: Martin Björklund
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-11
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-06
  • From: Yingzhen Qu
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10
  • From: Charlie Perkins
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10
  • From: Meral Shirazipour via Datatracker
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: Lloyd W
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: Ofer Inbar
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-11
  • From: John Scudder
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: tom petch
• Re: DNSSEC in real life
  • From: ned+ietf
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-11
  • From: Daniel Franke via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-11
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-11
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-10
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] [OPSEC] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-25
  • From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-yang-09
  • From: daniel
• Re: [Last-Call] [OPSEC] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-25
  • From: Tim Chown
• [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-26
  • From: Tim Chown via Datatracker
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: DNSSEC in real life
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: [Last-Call] [netconf] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server-09
  • From: Kent Watsen
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• DNSSEC in real life (was: snarls in real life)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• RE: hampering progress
  • From: Larry Masinter
• Re: Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-07
  • From: John Scudder
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-11
  • From: John Scudder
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-11
  • From: John Scudder
• Re: hampering progress
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-09
  • From: Loganaden Velvindron via Datatracker
• RE: Fwd: Quic: the Elephant in the Room
  • From: Vasilenko Eduard
• Re: Fwd: Quic: the Elephant in the Room
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Fwd: Quic: the Elephant in the Room
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] [OPSEC] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-25
  • From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• Re: hampering progress
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: hampering progress
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: hampering progress
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: hampering progress
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: hampering progress
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: hampering progress
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• hampering progress
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: [Last-Call] [OPSEC] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-25
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: [Last-Call] [OPSEC] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-25
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: [Last-Call] [OPSEC] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-25
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: [Last-Call] [netmod] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-08.txt> (A YANG Grouping for Geographic Locations) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christian Hopps
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Martin J. Dürst
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• snarls in real life
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Lloyd W
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: San Francisco?
  • From: Behcet Sarikaya
• Re: San Francisco?
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• L3 RFC draft help
  • From: Aqua Q Glass
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Fred Baker
• RE: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Larry Masinter
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: John Levine
• Re: San Francisco?
  • From: Behcet Sarikaya
• [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-06
  • From: Timothy Winters via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [netconf] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server-06
  • From: Ladislav Lhotka
• Re: [Last-Call] [netconf] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server-09
  • From: Ladislav Lhotka
• Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-06
  • From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Lloyd W
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dprive-xfr-over-tls-09
  • From: Dan Romascanu
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dprive-xfr-over-tls-09
  • From: Sara Dickinson
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Lloyd W
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Protocol and format (Was: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• RE: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Larry Masinter
• Re: [Last-Call] [netconf] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server-06
  • From: Kent Watsen
• adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools (was: What's the alternative to "snarling"?)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Protocol and format (Was: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: John Levine
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Protocol and format (Was: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Ofer Inbar
• Re: New-comers
  • From: Wes Hardaker
• Re: [Last-Call] [netconf] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server-09
  • From: Kent Watsen
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-08.txt> (A YANG Grouping for Geographic Locations) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Erik Kline
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: Protocol and format (Was: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Behcet Sarikaya
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Protocol and format (Was: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-06
  • From: Loganaden Velvindron via Datatracker
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Clint Chaplin
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: New Approach For Discussing IPng
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Protocol and format (Was: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: New-comers)
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Victor Kuarsingh
• RE: New Approach For Discussing IPng
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Re: New Approach For Discussing IPng
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• RE: New Approach For Discussing IPng
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Re: New Approach For Discussing IPng
  • From: Tom Beecher
• Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Tom Beecher
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• RE: New Approach For Discussing IPng
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Re: New Approach For Discussing IPng
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Protocol and format (Was: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• RE: New Approach For Discussing IPng
  • From: Vasilenko Eduard
• New Approach For Discussing IPng
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: San Francisco?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: San Francisco?
  • From: Michael Tuexen
• Re: New-comers
  • From: scott
• RE: San Francisco?
  • From: Andrew Campling
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Ofer Inbar
• Re: San Francisco?
  • From: Jared Mauch
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: New-comers)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: New-comers)
  • From: lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx
• RE: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Apr 18 06:00:02 2021
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: New-comers)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Lloyd W
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: New-comers
  • From: Jim Fenton
• Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
  • From: Larry Masinter
• San Francisco?
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
  • From: Larry Masinter
• Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
  • From: Michael Thomas
• RE: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Re: New-comers
  • From: tom petch
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dprive-xfr-over-tls-09
  • From: Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
• Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Ofer Inbar
• Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Lloyd W
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: New-comers
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: New-comers
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• New-comers
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• RE: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: STARK, BARBARA H
• New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Mary B
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Ofer Inbar
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• RE: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Vasilenko Eduard
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: tom petch
• Re: motivation to "join" IETF (was: the old fellowship program)
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Brian Carpenter
• Re: [Last-Call] [Iot-directorate] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10
  • From: Peter van der Stok
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
  • From: John C Klensin
• New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: scott
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Wes Hardaker
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Salz, Rich
• RE: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Michael McBride
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Proposed Process to Conduct Assessment Activity of IETF Administrative Support Activity
  • From: IETF Administration LLC Board of Directors Chair
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-11
  • From: Christer Holmberg via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10
  • From: Alvaro Retana
• motivation to "join" IETF (was: the old fellowship program)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: [Last-Call] [Iot-directorate] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10
  • From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: tom petch
• Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Vittorio Bertola
• [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10
  • From: Peter Van der Stok via Datatracker
• RE: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Vasilenko Eduard
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Colin Perkins
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Dan Harkins
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Victor Kuarsingh
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: John Levine
• Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Nico Williams