IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Bob Hinden
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-10
  • From: Daniel Migault via Datatracker
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Martin Vigoureux
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Scott Bradner
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Vittorio Bertola
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Scott Brim
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Lloyd W
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix-14
  • From: Jürgen Schönwälder via Datatracker
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Vittorio Bertola
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-05
  • From: Qin Wu
• Re: Status of this memo
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Status of this memo
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-08
  • From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
• Re: Escalation: time commitment to fix *production* security bugs for BLS RFC v4?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-05
  • From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
• BitCoin delenda est Was: Escalation: time commitment to fix *production* security bugs for BLS RFC v4?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Escalation: time commitment to fix *production* security bugs for BLS RFC v4?
  • From: Quan Thoi Minh Nguyen
• Re: Escalation: time commitment to fix *production* security bugs for BLS RFC v4?
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: Escalation: time commitment to fix *production* security bugs for BLS RFC v4?
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: Escalation: time commitment to fix *production* security bugs for BLS RFC v4?
  • From: Quan Thoi Minh Nguyen
• Re: Escalation: time commitment to fix *production* security bugs for BLS RFC v4?
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: Escalation: time commitment to fix *production* security bugs for BLS RFC v4?
  • From: Quan Thoi Minh Nguyen
• Re: Escalation: time commitment to fix *production* security bugs for BLS RFC v4?
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Fwd: Escalation: time commitment to fix *production* security bugs for BLS RFC v4?
  • From: Quan Thoi Minh Nguyen
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-new-block-10
  • From: mohamed.boucadair
• Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-06
  • From: tom petch
• Re: L3 RFC draft help
  • From: Aqua Q Glass
• Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Apr 25 06:00:02 2021
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-new-block-10
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-new-block-10
  • From: Pete Resnick
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-new-block-10
  • From: John C Klensin
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-new-block-10
  • From: Pete Resnick via Datatracker
• RE: Anyone know who the ISE is?
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Anyone know who the ISE is?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Anyone know who the ISE is?
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Anyone know who the ISE is?
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Test - please ignore
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-06
  • From: Yingzhen Qu
• Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-06
  • From: Acee Lindem (acee)
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: Salz, Rich
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-msdp-sa-interoperation-05
  • From: Qin Wu via Datatracker
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Carsten Bormann
• WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Ben Laurie
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: tom petch
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: tom petch
• Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-06
  • From: Martin Björklund
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-11
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-06
  • From: Yingzhen Qu
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10
  • From: Charlie Perkins
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10
  • From: Meral Shirazipour via Datatracker
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: Lloyd W
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: Ofer Inbar
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-11
  • From: John Scudder
• Re: Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Stray thoughts on ' Update of IESG statement "Last Call Guidance to the Community"'
  • From: tom petch
• Re: DNSSEC in real life
  • From: ned+ietf
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-11
  • From: Daniel Franke via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-11
  • From: Christer Holmberg
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-11
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id-10
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] [OPSEC] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-25
  • From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-yang-09
  • From: daniel
• Re: [Last-Call] [OPSEC] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-25
  • From: Tim Chown
• [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-26
  • From: Tim Chown via Datatracker
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: DNSSEC in real life
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: ned+ietf
• Re: [Last-Call] [netconf] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server-09
  • From: Kent Watsen
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• DNSSEC in real life (was: snarls in real life)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• RE: hampering progress
  • From: Larry Masinter
• Re: Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-07
  • From: John Scudder
• Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-11
  • From: John Scudder
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-11
  • From: John Scudder
• Re: hampering progress
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-09
  • From: Loganaden Velvindron via Datatracker
• RE: Fwd: Quic: the Elephant in the Room
  • From: Vasilenko Eduard
• Re: Fwd: Quic: the Elephant in the Room
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Fwd: Quic: the Elephant in the Room
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] [OPSEC] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-25
  • From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• Re: hampering progress
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: hampering progress
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: hampering progress
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: hampering progress
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: hampering progress
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: hampering progress
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• hampering progress
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: [Last-Call] [OPSEC] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-25
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: [Last-Call] [OPSEC] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-25
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: [Last-Call] [OPSEC] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-25
  • From: Tim Chown
• Re: [Last-Call] [netmod] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-08.txt> (A YANG Grouping for Geographic Locations) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Christian Hopps
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Martin J. Dürst
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: snarls in real life
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• snarls in real life
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Lloyd W
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: San Francisco?
  • From: Behcet Sarikaya
• Re: San Francisco?
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Jay Daley
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• L3 RFC draft help
  • From: Aqua Q Glass
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Fred Baker
• RE: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Larry Masinter
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: John Levine
• Re: San Francisco?
  • From: Behcet Sarikaya
• [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-06
  • From: Timothy Winters via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] [netconf] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server-06
  • From: Ladislav Lhotka
• Re: [Last-Call] [netconf] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server-09
  • From: Ladislav Lhotka
• Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-06
  • From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Lloyd W
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dprive-xfr-over-tls-09
  • From: Dan Romascanu
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dprive-xfr-over-tls-09
  • From: Sara Dickinson
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Lloyd W
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Protocol and format (Was: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• RE: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Larry Masinter
• Re: [Last-Call] [netconf] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server-06
  • From: Kent Watsen
• adapting IETF in light of github and similar tools (was: What's the alternative to "snarling"?)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Protocol and format (Was: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: John Levine
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Protocol and format (Was: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Ofer Inbar
• Re: New-comers
  • From: Wes Hardaker
• Re: [Last-Call] [netconf] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server-09
  • From: Kent Watsen
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-08.txt> (A YANG Grouping for Geographic Locations) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Erik Kline
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: Protocol and format (Was: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Behcet Sarikaya
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Protocol and format (Was: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-06
  • From: Loganaden Velvindron via Datatracker
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Clint Chaplin
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Dave Cridland
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: New Approach For Discussing IPng
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Protocol and format (Was: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Joseph Touch
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: New-comers)
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Victor Kuarsingh
• RE: New Approach For Discussing IPng
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Re: New Approach For Discussing IPng
  • From: Christopher Morrow
• RE: New Approach For Discussing IPng
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Re: New Approach For Discussing IPng
  • From: Tom Beecher
• Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Tom Beecher
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• RE: New Approach For Discussing IPng
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Re: New Approach For Discussing IPng
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Protocol and format (Was: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• RE: New Approach For Discussing IPng
  • From: Vasilenko Eduard
• New Approach For Discussing IPng
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: San Francisco?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: San Francisco?
  • From: Michael Tuexen
• Re: New-comers
  • From: scott
• RE: San Francisco?
  • From: Andrew Campling
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Ofer Inbar
• Re: San Francisco?
  • From: Jared Mauch
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: New-comers)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: New-comers)
  • From: lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx
• RE: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Apr 18 06:00:02 2021
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Joe Touch
• Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• What's the alternative to "snarling"? (was: New-comers)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Lloyd W
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
  • From: Michael Richardson
• Re: New-comers
  • From: Jim Fenton
• Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
  • From: Larry Masinter
• San Francisco?
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
  • From: Larry Masinter
• Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
  • From: Michael Thomas
• RE: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Re: New-comers
  • From: tom petch
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dprive-xfr-over-tls-09
  • From: Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
• Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Ofer Inbar
• Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Re: New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Lloyd W
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: New-comers
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: New-comers
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• New-comers
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• RE: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: STARK, BARBARA H
• New Approach For Discussing IPv10.
  • From: Khaled Omar
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Mary B
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Ofer Inbar
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
• RE: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Vasilenko Eduard
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: tom petch
• Re: motivation to "join" IETF (was: the old fellowship program)
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: S Moonesamy
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Brian Carpenter
• Re: [Last-Call] [Iot-directorate] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10
  • From: Peter van der Stok
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
  • From: Ole Jacobsen
• Re: New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
  • From: John C Klensin
• New-comers (was Re: the old fellowship program)
  • From: Andrew Sullivan
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: scott
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Wes Hardaker
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Salz, Rich
• RE: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Michael McBride
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Proposed Process to Conduct Assessment Activity of IETF Administrative Support Activity
  • From: IETF Administration LLC Board of Directors Chair
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-11
  • From: Christer Holmberg via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10
  • From: Alvaro Retana
• motivation to "join" IETF (was: the old fellowship program)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Theodore Ts'o
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: John R Levine
• Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: [Last-Call] [Iot-directorate] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10
  • From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: tom petch
• Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Vittorio Bertola
• [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10
  • From: Peter Van der Stok via Datatracker
• RE: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Vasilenko Eduard
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Colin Perkins
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Dan Harkins
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Victor Kuarsingh
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: the old fellowship program, was Wow, we're famous
  • From: John Levine
• Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Donald Eastlake
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Jim Fenton
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Last-Call] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-crocker-inreply-react-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
  • From: Murray S. Kucherawy
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Bron Gondwana
• Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-17
  • From: Francesca Palombini
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-06
  • From: Martin Björklund via Datatracker
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: tom petch
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Petite Abeille
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang-09
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-11
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Jim Fenton
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Last-Call] [OPSEC] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-25
  • From: Warren Kumari
• Re: Wow, we're famous, was WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: John Levine
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: John Levine
• Re: [Last-Call] Last-call comments on OAM in SRv6 draft
  • From: Greg Mirsky
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: John R Levine
• [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-qos-model-03
  • From: Jürgen Schönwälder via Datatracker
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-spring-srv6-oam-09.txt> (Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) in Segment Routing Networks with IPv6 Data plane (SRv6)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Magnus Westerlund
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Andrew McConachie
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Petite Abeille
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Petite Abeille
• Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: new RRTYPEs, was DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: John Levine
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Marco Davids
• [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10
  • From: Tero Kivinen via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-09
  • From: Ron Bonica via Datatracker
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Petite Abeille
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06
  • From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
• Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-interleaved-modes-04.txt> (NTP Interleaved Modes) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Miroslav Lichvar
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Andrew McConachie
• Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06
  • From: tom petch
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-09.txt> (YANG Data Model for Babel) to Proposed Standard
  • From: tom petch
• [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-http-client-server-06
  • From: Ladislav Lhotka via Datatracker
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality (was: Re: Quic: the elephant in the room)
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: DNSSEC architecture vs reality (was: Re: Quic: the elephant in the room)
  • From: Michael Thomas
• DNSSEC architecture vs reality (was: Re: Quic: the elephant in the room)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Ben Laurie
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Ben Laurie
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Ben Laurie
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-interleaved-modes-04.txt> (NTP Interleaved Modes) to Proposed Standard
  • From: David L. Mills
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Salz, Rich
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Ben Laurie
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Ben Laurie
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Ben Laurie
• [ot] Fwd: [ann] publictext
  • From: Petite Abeille
• Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Apr 11 06:00:02 2021
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: DNS vs PKI, was Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: [Last-Call] [OPSEC] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-25
  • From: Enno Rey
• Re: DNS vs PKI, was Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Viktor Dukhovni
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Ben Laurie
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Ben Laurie
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: media casting cluster*
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Quic: the elephant in the room
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-6man-spring-srv6-oam-10
  • From: Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-06
  • From: Yaron Sheffer
• [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server-09
  • From: Ladislav Lhotka via Datatracker
• Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-core-sid-15
  • From: Alexander Pelov
• Re: [Last-Call] secdir review of draft-ietf-6man-spring-srv6-oam
  • From: Zafar Ali (zali)
• Re: [Last-Call] Last-call comments on OAM in SRv6 draft
  • From: Zafar Ali (zali)
• Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-spring-srv6-oam-09.txt> (Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) in Segment Routing Networks with IPv6 Data plane (SRv6)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Zafar Ali (zali)
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-spring-srv6-oam-09
  • From: Zafar Ali (zali)
• [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-access-token-jwt-12
  • From: Joseph Salowey via Datatracker
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: John Scudder
• [Last-Call] secdir review of draft-ietf-6man-spring-srv6-oam
  • From: Dan Harkins
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06
  • From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
• Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-interleaved-modes-04
  • From: Miroslav Lichvar
• Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
  • From: Tom Herbert
• Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
  • From: Timothy J. Salo
• Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
  • From: Tom Herbert
• Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
  • From: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
• Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
  • From: Tom Herbert
• Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
  • From: Tom Herbert
• Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
  • From: Tom Herbert
• Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
  • From: Tom Herbert
• Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: media casting cluster*
  • From: Tim Cappalli
• Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• IETF Annual Report 2020
  • From: IETF Administration LLC Board of Directors Chair
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Leif Johansson
• Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
  • From: Tom Herbert
• Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
  • From: Nick Hilliard
• Re: [Last-Call] [v6ops] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
  • From: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [admin-discuss] IETF LLC Statement on OFAC Compliance Questions
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• Re: Fwd: Initial suggestion from the IETF SAA
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Masataka Ohta
• Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
  • From: Lloyd W
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-interleaved-modes-04.txt> (NTP Interleaved Modes) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Miroslav Lichvar
• [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-25
  • From: Tim Chown via Datatracker
• [Last-Call] Antw: [EXT] Re: [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-interleaved-modes-04.txt> (NTP Interleaved Modes) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ulrich Windl
• Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
  • From: Dan Harkins
• Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [admin-discuss] IETF LLC Statement on OFAC Compliance Questions
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
  • From: Dan Harkins
• Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
  • From: Fernando Gont
• Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
  • From: Lloyd W
• Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-interleaved-modes-04
  • From: Theresa Enghardt via Datatracker
• Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
  • From: Dan Harkins
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Nico Williams
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator-14
  • From: Yaron Sheffer
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: WG Review: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents (term)
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
  • From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-06
  • From: Ines Robles
• Re: [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator-14
  • From: Benjamin Kaduk
• Re: [Last-Call] [Ntp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ntp-interleaved-modes-04.txt> (NTP Interleaved Modes) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Daniel Franke
• Re: Fwd: Initial suggestion from the IETF SAA
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Fwd: Initial suggestion from the IETF SAA
  • From: Adam Roach
• Re: Fwd: Initial suggestion from the IETF SAA
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-06
  • From: Carsten Bormann