Note that if we get back to face-to-face workshops, the trade-offs get
more complicated among issues like encouraging free-flowing
conversations and making a sensible stream / recording available.
Yours,
Joel
On 8/31/2021 10:26 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
Toerless,
Thanks for the explanation, but: I did not raise any issue with the way
the invitations are handled as i have too little insight. All i was
asking for was that there should be a live stream unless there
is a justifyable reason for confidentiality such as chatham house rules.
I actually agree with that. And again for context, we tended to debate that quite a bit few years ago with in-person workshops, and whether suitable conferencing equipment was available, whether it made sense even if it was available, etc. I’m in the camp where for most things a live stream should be provided. However, doesn’t take away Colin’s strong point about other mechanisms for providing transparency and access. In a lot of cases the access to structured reports, all papers, software, or even recordings are all very good mechanisms, indeed sometimes the best mechanisms as Colin points out.
Jari
_______________________________________________
Architecture-discuss mailing list
Architecture-discuss@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss
