Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-18

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bron: thanks for the ART art review!

Francesca

On 06/09/2021, 16:28, "Bron Gondwana via Datatracker" <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

    Reviewer: Bron Gondwana
    Review result: Ready

    I have been requested to review this document as the ARTART reviewer.

    Congratulations on this massive piece of work.  It's valuable and important and
    clearly represents a lot of time for a lot of people!  I read the whole thing,
    though I admit I skimmed over the references and appendix information since I
    assume they were software generated.

    I'm afraid I probably missed heaps of stuff when reading this document, the
    reverse bikeshed problem, this thing is a nuclear reactor and I'm sure the
    people who wrote it are very smart and understand what they are doing!  I found
    it quite repetitive in parts, particularly when it's using boilerplate for "you
    really shouldn't do this and it won't interoperate but maybe you have an
    agreement between the client and the server to do it anyway" - but I understand
    the reason for doing so to make each section self-contained.

    Thanks for doing this important work - I learned a fair bit about the history
    of HTTP and some of the interesting edge cases reading this.

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux