A pointer to the draft would be helpful,
thanks,
Ted
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 5:13 PM Templin (US), Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
FYI, responding to add 6man to the distribution.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Templin (US), Fred L
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2021 8:38 AM
> To: IETF discussion list <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Hunter (US), Mark W <mark.w.hunter2@xxxxxxxxxx>; Nache (US), Samuel J <samuel.j.nache@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: I want to reclaim 192.88.99.0/24 - does anyone have a problem with that?
>
> Hi, RFC3068 set aside the prefix 192.88.99.0/24 as the 6to4 Relay Anycast prefix, and
> then RFC7526 came along and deprecated that use. I would like to reclaim the prefix
> and use it for a different anycasting purpose - mostly within IPv4 networks that would
> not be places where one would ordinarily find a 6to4 Relay router.
>
> RFC7526 Section 7 says:
>
> "Redelegation of this prefix for any use requires justification via an IETF Standards
> Action [RFC5226]."
>
> and I have a document that is aligned toward IETF Standards Track that would do
> precisely this. This would be "Plan A", but if that would be unworkable then we may
> need to press forward with a "Plan B".
>
> There are those of you out there who know exactly what this is about and some have
> even made remarks about it during recent IETF working group presentations. Now is
> the time to speak up and put all concerns on the table - silence is no longer an option.
>
> Thanks - Fred
