FYI, responding to add 6man to the distribution. > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Templin (US), Fred L > Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2021 8:38 AM > To: IETF discussion list <ietf@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: Hunter (US), Mark W <mark.w.hunter2@xxxxxxxxxx>; Nache (US), Samuel J <samuel.j.nache@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: I want to reclaim 192.88.99.0/24 - does anyone have a problem with that? > > Hi, RFC3068 set aside the prefix 192.88.99.0/24 as the 6to4 Relay Anycast prefix, and > then RFC7526 came along and deprecated that use. I would like to reclaim the prefix > and use it for a different anycasting purpose - mostly within IPv4 networks that would > not be places where one would ordinarily find a 6to4 Relay router. > > RFC7526 Section 7 says: > > "Redelegation of this prefix for any use requires justification via an IETF Standards > Action [RFC5226]." > > and I have a document that is aligned toward IETF Standards Track that would do > precisely this. This would be "Plan A", but if that would be unworkable then we may > need to press forward with a "Plan B". > > There are those of you out there who know exactly what this is about and some have > even made remarks about it during recent IETF working group presentations. Now is > the time to speak up and put all concerns on the table - silence is no longer an option. > > Thanks - Fred
