why bother - when they actually need to do something they will or they will perish Scott > On Sep 9, 2021, at 12:44 PM, Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > And I think they need convincing, what you think ? > > Khaled Omar > > -----Original Message----- > From: Randall Gellens [mailto:rg+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 6:41 PM > To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Scott Bradner <sob@xxxxxxxxx>; ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: What's going on with the IETF. > > On 9 Sep 2021, at 9:11, Khaled Omar wrote: > >>>> If an organizations wants some IPv4 addresses but can't get any, >>>> wouldn't that be an incentive for that organization to deploy IPv6? >> >> Yes, right, but can you convince all of them to deploy IPv6? > > When people need IPv6, they will deploy it. When they can live without it, then they need convincing. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Randall Gellens [mailto:rg+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 6:09 PM >> To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Scott Bradner <sob@xxxxxxxxx>; ietf@xxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: What's going on with the IETF. >> >> On 9 Sep 2021, at 8:17, Khaled Omar wrote: >> >>> It means we will have two blocks, IPv4-only block, and IPv6-only >>> block, where is the communication between them with an applied >>> solution, still nothing. >>> >>> Most organizations still don't accept to have IPv6 in their networks, >>> and at the same time they cannot have IPv4 due to the depletion, so >>> where are we going?!!!!! >> >> If an organizations wants some IPv4 addresses but can't get any, >> wouldn't that be an incentive for that organization to deploy IPv6? >> >> --Randall
