IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- RE: The right of way principle... Was: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by
- RE: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- RE: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-registry-maintenance-16
- From: Melinda Shore via Datatracker
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Aug 8 06:00:03 2021
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-sacm-coswid-18
- From: Scott Bradner via Datatracker
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bier-te-arch-10
- From: Robert Sparks via Datatracker
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- The right of way principle... Was: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6lo-plc-06
- From: Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6lo-plc-06
- From: Dave Thaler via Datatracker
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv4 depletion.
- RE: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- From: Templin (US), Fred L
- RE: IPv4 depletion.
- From: Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Last-Call] [netmod] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-09
- Is IETF doomed ? Re: IETF 112 will be a fully online meeting
- Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-08
- Re: IETF 112 will be a fully online meeting
- [Last-Call] [OPSAWG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-10.txt> (A Layer 3 VPN Network YANG Model) to Proposed Standard
- Re: IETF 112 will be a fully online meeting
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-06
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-15
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-plc-05
- Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-08
- From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-05
- From: Yaron Sheffer via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-08
- From: Bob Halley via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] [OPSAWG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-10.txt> (A Layer 3 VPN Network YANG Model) to Proposed Standard
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common-09
- From: Tim Wicinski via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-05
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- IPv4 depletion.
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-bier-te-arch-10
- From: Tommy Pauly via Datatracker
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-05
- From: Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker
- RE: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-12
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-12
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-12
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-12
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis-04
- From: Derrell Piper via Datatracker
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-10
- From: Qin Wu via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-10
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-12
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-24
- From: Sarah Banks via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-12
- [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-sacm-coswid-18
- From: Rich Salz via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [TLS] [Iot-directorate] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate-04
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common-09.txt> (A Layer 2/3 VPN Common YANG Model) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Last-Call] [TLS] [Iot-directorate] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate-04
- Re: [Last-Call] [TLS] [Iot-directorate] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate-04
- Re: [Last-Call] [Iot-directorate] [TLS] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate-04
- [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common-09
- From: Wesley Eddy via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-24
- From: Kyle Rose via Datatracker
- IETF 111 Meeting T-Shirts
- Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-29
- From: Mahesh Jethanandani
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-common-09
- From: Joel Halpern via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [TLS] [Iot-directorate] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate-04
- Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-29
- Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-29
- Re: [Last-Call] [Iot-directorate] [TLS] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate-04
- Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-29
- Rethinking process in the age of DISPATCH
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Last-Call] [sfc] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity-06
- Re: [Last-Call] [sfc] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity-06
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-10
- Re: [Last-Call] [sfc] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity-06
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity-06
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity-06
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-10.txt> (A Layer 3 VPN Network YANG Model) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity-06
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-05
- Re: [Last-Call] [TLS] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate-04
- Re: [Last-Call] [TLS] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate-04
- RE: The best time to start virtual meetings
- Re: The best time to start virtual meetings
- The best time to start virtual meetings
- Re: [Last-Call] [TLS] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate-04
- Re: [Last-Call] [TLS] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate-04
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-05
- From: Thomas Fossati via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity-06
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6lo-plc-06
- NomCom office hours for IETF 111 (Monday and Friday)
- From: g_e_montenegro=40yahoo . com
- Re: [Last-Call] [netconf] Secdir last call partial review of draft-ietf-netconf-tls-client-server-25
- [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity-06
- From: Joseph Touch via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-12
- [Last-Call] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-rift-applicability-06
- From: Ralf Weber via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-10
- From: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-12
- From: Joseph Salowey via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6lo-plc-06
- From: Robert Sparks via Datatracker
- IAB report to the community for IETF 111
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-05
- Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-core-sid-15
- [Last-Call] Fwd: RtgDir review: draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-10
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-05
- From: Rich Salz via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call partial review of draft-ietf-netconf-tls-client-server-25
- From: Watson Ladd via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-alto-performance-metrics-16
- From: Vincent Roca via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-housley-ers-asn1-modules-02
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-housley-ers-asn1-modules-02
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-housley-ers-asn1-modules-02
- From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
- Subject: NomCom 2021-2022: Composition of IETF Nominating Committee
- [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-29
- From: Mahesh Jethanandani via Datatracker
- NomCom Input - Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- IETF 111 Meetecho Test Sessions Next Week
- Re: Applied Networking Research Prize awards at IETF 111
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ext] Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-06.txt> (Export of MPLS Segment Routing Label Type Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)) to Informational RFC
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ext] Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-06.txt> (Export of MPLS Segment Routing Label Type Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)) to Informational RFC
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ext] Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-06.txt> (Export of MPLS Segment Routing Label Type Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)) to Informational RFC
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ext] Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-06.txt> (Export of MPLS Segment Routing Label Type Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)) to Informational RFC
- [Last-Call] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-08
- From: Tim Chown via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-10
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-12
- [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis-12
- From: David Black via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-10
- From: Matt Joras via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-kex-sha2-19
- From: Mališa Vučinić via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [netmod] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-09
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-interleaved-modes-04
- IETF 111 Standard Registration Deadline and Internet Draft Submission Cut-off Today!
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-sid-15
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-16
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-kex-sha2-19
- Re: Draft report on first annual IETF community survey
- [Last-Call] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-16
- From: Peter Yee via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [EXT] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-qos-model-03
- From: Aseem Choudhary (asechoud)
- Re: [Last-Call] [Rift] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rift-yang-03
- Re: T-shirt IETF-107?
- NomCom Random Selection Results
- [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-rift-yang-03
- From: Michal Vaško via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-06.txt> (Export of MPLS Segment Routing Label Type Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)) to Informational RFC
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-06.txt> (Export of MPLS Segment Routing Label Type Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)) to Informational RFC
- IETF 111 Standard Registration Deadline and Internet Draft Submission Cut-off Approaching
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-06.txt> (Export of MPLS Segment Routing Label Type Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)) to Informational RFC
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-mpls-sr-label-type-06.txt> (Export of MPLS Segment Routing Label Type Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)) to Informational RFC
- T-shirt IETF-107?
- From: Marco Davids (SIDN)
- NomCom 2021-2022 Final List of volunteers
- Re: [media-types] WG Review: Media Type Maintenance (mediaman)
- [Last-Call] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-kex-sha2-19
- From: Roni Even via Datatracker
- Re: WG Review: Media Type Maintenance (mediaman)
- Re: WG Review: Media Type Maintenance (mediaman)
- Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Jul 4 06:00:02 2021
- IETF 111 Final Agenda
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-09
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-09
- From: Shwetha Bhandari via Datatracker
- RE: Randomness sources for the IETF 2021-2022 Nomcom Selection
- From: g_e_montenegro=40yahoo . com
- Jul 1 Update to List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: Randomness sources for the IETF 2021-2022 Nomcom Selection
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- RE: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- From: g_e_montenegro=40yahoo . com
- RE: Randomness sources for the IETF 2021-2022 Nomcom Selection
- From: g_e_montenegro=40yahoo . com
- Corrrection: Updated Randomness sources for the IETF 2021-2022 Nomcom Selection
- Updated Randomness sources for the IETF 2021-2022 Nomcom Selection
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: Randomness sources for the IETF 2021-2022 Nomcom Selection
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-09
- From: Alexey Melnikov via Datatracker
- Re: Randomness sources for the IETF 2021-2022 Nomcom Selection
- Re: Randomness sources for the IETF 2021-2022 Nomcom Selection
- Statement on Affiliation and Voting Members
- Randomness sources for the IETF 2021-2022 Nomcom Selection
- Re: What is the long term plan for Internet evolution?
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-04
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker via Datatracker
- Updated List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: What is the long term plan for Internet evolution?
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: What is the long term plan for Internet evolution?
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: What is the long term plan for Internet evolution?
- Re: What is the long term plan for Internet evolution?
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: What is the long term plan for Internet evolution?
- RE: What is the long term plan for Internet evolution?
- Re: What is the long term plan for Internet evolution?
- [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-14
- From: Chris Lonvick via Datatracker
- RE: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- From: g_e_montenegro=40yahoo . com
- Re: What is the long term plan for Internet evolution?
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: What is the long term plan for Internet evolution?
- RE: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- From: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- RE: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- What is the long term plan for Internet evolution?
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: The Document Citation Tool is (somewhat) broken
- RE: Eligibility criteria [Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom]
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: Eligibility criteria [Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom]
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Eligibility criteria [Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom]
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: The Document Citation Tool is (somewhat) broken
- The Document Citation Tool is (somewhat) broken
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- RE: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- RE: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- From: Maisonneuve, Julien (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- RE: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: [Last-Call] [Iot-directorate] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-6man-grand-04
- From: Carles Gomez Montenegro
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- RE: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- RE: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Jun 27 06:00:02 2021
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- Re: List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- List of volunteers for the 2021-2022 NomCom
- IETF 111 Preliminary Agenda
- Re: SONIC - OpenRAN "5G" and IP at the edge
- SONIC - OpenRAN "5G" and IP at the edge
- From: Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-drip-reqs-13
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity-05
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-integrity-05
- From: Jürgen Schönwälder via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [netmod] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-09.txt> (Comparison of NMDA datastores) to Proposed Standard
- From: Cumming, James (Nokia - US)
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-drip-reqs-13
- From: Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [Manycouches] Last Call: <draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting-04.txt> (Considerations for Cancellation of IETF Meetings) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [Last-Call] [Manycouches] Last Call: <draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting-04.txt> (Considerations for Cancellation of IETF Meetings) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [Last-Call] [Manycouches] Last Call: <draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting-04.txt> (Considerations for Cancellation of IETF Meetings) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [Last-Call] [Manycouches] Last Call: <draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting-04.txt> (Considerations for Cancellation of IETF Meetings) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [Last-Call] [Manycouches] Last Call: <draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting-04.txt> (Considerations for Cancellation of IETF Meetings) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-grand-04
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-grand-04
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-grand-04
- Re: [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-6man-grand-04
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-grand-04
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-grand-04
- Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Jun 20 06:00:02 2021
- Re: [Last-Call] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-20
- Re: [Last-Call] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-20
- From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-09.txt> (Comparison of NMDA datastores) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-06
- [Last-Call] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-6man-grand-04
- From: Carles Gomez via Datatracker
- Re: DRAFT Minutes of the 06-17-2021 IESG Teleconference
- From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-06
- Re: DRAFT Minutes of the 06-17-2021 IESG Teleconference
- From: Francesca Palombini
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-20.txt> (IPv6 Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (IPWAVE): Problem Statement and Use Cases) to Informational RFC
- From: Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- [Last-Call] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-20
- From: Pascal Thubert via Datatracker
- Re: DRAFT Minutes of the 06-17-2021 IESG Teleconference
- From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-06
- Applied Networking Research Prize awards at IETF 111
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-grand-04
- From: Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest-08
- From: Joel Halpern via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-sztp-csr-02
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-06
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-06
- [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-06
- From: Yoshifumi Nishida via Datatracker
- Third (and final) NomCom 2021-2022 Call for Volunteers
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-06
- From: Christopher Wood via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-sztp-csr-02
- From: Joe Clarke (jclarke)
- Re: [Last-Call] [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-sztp-csr-02
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-20.txt> (IPv6 Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (IPWAVE): Problem Statement and Use Cases) to Informational RFC
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-20.txt> (IPv6 Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (IPWAVE): Problem Statement and Use Cases) to Informational RFC
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-20.txt> (IPv6 Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (IPWAVE): Problem Statement and Use Cases) to Informational RFC
- From: Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-20.txt> (IPv6 Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (IPWAVE): Problem Statement and Use Cases) to Informational RFC
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-20.txt> (IPv6 Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (IPWAVE): Problem Statement and Use Cases) to Informational RFC
- Re: [Last-Call] [core] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-15
- From: Joe Clarke (jclarke)
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-drip-reqs-12
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-drip-reqs-12
- Re: [Last-Call] [core] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-15
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Last-Call] [core] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-15
- Re: [Last-Call] [core] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-15
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting-04
- From: Gyan Mishra via Datatracker
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-core-sid-15
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Jun 13 06:00:02 2021
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-6man-grand-04
- From: Scott Kelly via Datatracker
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- Re: RFC793#ietf.org (was: Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy)
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: RFC793#ietf.org (was: Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy)
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- Re: RFC793#ietf.org (was: Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy)
- RE: (new!) One click to volunteer for NomCom 2021-2022
- From: g_e_montenegro=40yahoo . com
- Re: RFC793#ietf.org (was: Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy)
- Re: RFC793#ietf.org (was: Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy)
- Re: lots of dead addresses, was RFC793#ietf.org (was: Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy)
- Re: (new!) One click to volunteer for NomCom 2021-2022
- Re: lots of dead addresses, was RFC793#ietf.org (was: Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy)
- (new!) One click to volunteer for NomCom 2021-2022
- Re: lots of dead addresses, was RFC793#ietf.org (was: Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy)
- Re: RFC793#ietf.org (was: Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy)
- RFC793#ietf.org (was: Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy)
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- Re: [Last-Call] [stir] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-02
- Fun with soccer and playout latency
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-perc-dtls-tunnel-08
- Re: [Last-Call] [stir] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-02
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- Re: [Last-Call] [stir] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-02
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-02
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-jpegxs-12
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-16
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-16
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-16
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ospfv3-codepoint-04.txt> (OSPFv3 CodePoint for MPLS LSP Ping) to Proposed Standard
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ospfv3-codepoint-04
- From: Christer Holmberg via Datatracker
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-perc-dtls-tunnel-08
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-16
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- Re: Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- Proposed ietf.org email address policy
- [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-16
- From: Olivier Bonaventure via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ospfv3-codepoint-04
- From: Tero Kivinen via Datatracker
- Re: The problem we could solve (re github etc.)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-16
- Re: The problem we could solve (re github etc.)
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-16
- From: Dale Worley via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-16
- Re: The problem we could solve (re github etc.)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: The problem we could solve (re github etc.)
- Re: The problem we could solve (re github etc.)
- Re: The problem we could solve (re github etc.)
- Re: The problem we could solve (re github etc.)
- The problem we could solve (re github etc.)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: github terms of service, not Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-06
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Last-Call] [EXT] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-default-sc-07
- Second (of three) NomCom 2021-2022 Call for Volunteers
- RE: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- From: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-drip-reqs-12
- From: Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-drip-reqs-12
- From: Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: Request to Charter a New Working Group: Oblivious HTTP (OHTTP)
- RE: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- From: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-16
- From: Roni Even via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model-28.txt> (A YANG Data Model for Routing Policy) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: [Last-Call] [stir] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-02
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-drip-reqs-12
- Re: Request to Charter a New Working Group: Oblivious HTTP (OHTTP)
- Re: Request to Charter a New Working Group: Oblivious HTTP (OHTTP)
- Re: Request to Charter a New Working Group: Oblivious HTTP (OHTTP)
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-sztp-csr-02
- From: Joe Clarke via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-grand-04
- From: Michael Scharf via Datatracker
- Re: Request to Charter a New Working Group: Oblivious HTTP (OHTTP)
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-drip-reqs-12
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-perc-dtls-tunnel-08
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-perc-dtls-tunnel-08
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-16
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-drip-reqs-12
- From: Nagendra Nainar via Datatracker
- Re: Moderation at scale is hard^Wimpossible, or Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: Moderation at scale is hard^Wimpossible, or Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-drip-reqs-12
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis-09
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-par-08
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- IETF 111 Online: Early Bird Registration Ends Today!
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Last-Call] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis-09
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-06
- From: Stewart Bryant via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis-09
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis-09
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Postel's Principle and Layer 9 protocol engineering
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis-09
- From: Suhas Nandakumar via Datatracker
- Re: Postel's Principle and Layer 9 protocol engineering
- Re: Postel's Principle and Layer 9 protocol engineering
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- From: lloydwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Postel's Principle and Layer 9 protocol engineering
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-perc-dtls-tunnel-08
- From: Shawn Emery via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-par-08
- From: Meral Shirazipour via Datatracker
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: Postel's Principle and Layer 9 protocol engineering
- Re: Postel's Principle and Layer 9 protocol engineering
- RE: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- RE: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: Postel's Principle and Layer 9 protocol engineering
- RE: Postel's Principle and Layer 9 protocol engineering
- Re: Postel's Principle and Layer 9 protocol engineering
- Re: Postel's Principle and Layer 9 protocol engineering
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Postel's Principle and Layer 9 protocol engineering
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- From: Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-16
- From: Al Morton via Datatracker
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun Jun 6 06:00:03 2021
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- RE: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-02
- Re: Clarifying the state of and the transition plan for tools.ietf.org
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-drip-reqs-12
- From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-02
- From: Theresa Enghardt via Datatracker
- REMINDER: IETF 111 Early Bird Cutoff is Monday, June 7, 2021
- REMINDER: IETF 111 Early Bird Cutoff is Monday, June 17, 2021
- Re: [Last-Call] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis-09
- [Last-Call] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis-09
- RE: NomCom 2021-2022 Call for Volunteers
- From: g_e_montenegro=40yahoo . com
- Re: NomCom 2021-2022 Call for Volunteers
- Re: NomCom 2021-2022 Call for Volunteers
- Re: NomCom 2021-2022 Call for Volunteers
- Re: [Last-Call] [stir] Last Call: <draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-02.txt> (Enhanced JWT Claim Constraints for STIR Certificates) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Last-Call] [stir] Last Call: <draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-02.txt> (Enhanced JWT Claim Constraints for STIR Certificates) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Last-Call] [stir] Last Call: <draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-02.txt> (Enhanced JWT Claim Constraints for STIR Certificates) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-stir-enhance-rfc8226-02.txt> (Enhanced JWT Claim Constraints for STIR Certificates) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-05
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-16
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-16
- From: Mohit Sethi via Datatracker
- Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun May 30 06:00:02 2021
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis-09
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis-09
- From: Qin Wu via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-16
- From: Derek Atkins via Datatracker
- Re: Global Update: Your input is needed!
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-default-sc-07
- From: Christian Huitema via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-tls-client-server-24
- Re: [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-client-server-24
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-perc-dtls-tunnel-08
- From: Russ Housley via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6man-spring-srv6-oam-10
- From: Carlos Bernardos via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-06
- Re: [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-06
- Re: [Last-Call] [TLS] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate-04
- Re: [Last-Call] SECDIR Review draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-05
- Re: [Last-Call] SECDIR Review draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-05
- Re: [Last-Call] [Dots] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-05
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-05
- Re: [Last-Call] SECDIR Review draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-05
- NomCom 2021-2022 Call for Volunteers
- From: g_e_montenegro=40yahoo . com
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-senml-versions-02
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-senml-versions-02
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-port-randomization-06
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-02
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-senml-versions-02
- Reminder: IETF 111 Birds of a Feather (BOF) proposals requested by 28 May
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-core-senml-versions-02
- Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6man-spring-srv6-oam-09
- Call for nominees for the Postel Award
- [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-tls-client-server-24
- From: Andy Bierman via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-ssh-client-server-24
- From: Andy Bierman via Datatracker
- IESG Approves Conflict of Interest Policy
- Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest-07
- Re: [Last-Call] [bmwg] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest-07
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest-07
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-default-sc-07
- From: Thomas Fossati via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ace] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-41
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest-07
- From: Jana Iyengar via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest-07
- From: Ines Robles via Datatracker
- Messages from the ietf list for the week ending Sun May 23 06:00:02 2021
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest-07
- From: Robert Sparks via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [Ace] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-41
- [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-41
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] [AVTCORE] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-avtcore-multi-party-rtt-mix-14
- From: Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-babel-yang-model-09.txt> (YANG Data Model for Babel) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-10
- Re: [Last-Call] [Int-dir] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-10
- From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-10
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-10
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-16
- From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-10
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-datacenter-gateway-10
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-16
- From: Paul Wouters via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-10
- From: Wassim Haddad via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-14
- From: Juan Alcaide (jalcaide)
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Announcements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]