RE: IETF 114 in the USA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In general, it is the right direction of thinking: "to choose the country that is more open".
But how to guess now who would be more open in 9 months?!?
"Open" cold become "closed" or "banned" very fast as a result of a new wave of influenza.
I did not monitor the situation, but for a long time, the Swedish government was less inclined to panic.
Which country has the predictable government? The list should be very short.
Ed/
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 8:16 AM
To: IETF <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: IETF 114 in the USA

I know that it is a long way out, but  there seems to be a significant body of opinion that the US will not open up to travel by the residents of a significant number of IETF participants until the end of 2022.

Under these circumstances should we not be moving IETF 114 from the USA to a country that is open to International participation in technical standards meetings?

Moving a meeting is no small undertaking, and the sooner we take steps to move to a less restrictive country, the higher the chance that we will have a face to face rather than virtual meeting.

- Stewart






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux