Linda, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On 2021-7-20, at 3:04, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-housley-ers-asn1-modules-?? > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar > Review Date: 2021-07-19 > IETF LC End Date: 2021-08-13 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > This document offers alternate ASN.1 modules that conform to the 2002 version > of ASN.1 for Evidence Record Syntax (ERS). > > Question: > Is the Evidence Record Syntax specified in this draft going to obsolete RFC4998? > > How come the AlgorithmIdentifier in this draft is slightly different from the > AlgorithmIdentifier in RFC4998? > > This draft has: > > AlgorithmIdentifier{}, DIGEST-ALGORITHM > FROM AlgorithmInformation-2009 -- in [RFC5912] > { iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1) > security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7) id-mod(0) > id-mod-algorithmInformation-02(58) } > > RFC4998 has: > AlgorithmIdentifier > FROM PKIX1Explicit88 > { iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) > internet(1) security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7) > mod(0) pkix1-explicit(18) } > > RFC4998's pkix1-explicit(18) is not present in this draft. Is it intended? > > Best Regards, > Linda Dunbar > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
