[Last-Call] Antw: [EXT] [Ntp] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-interleaved-modes-06

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>> Catherine Meadows via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> schrieb am 27.08.2021
um
22:01 in Nachricht <163009446578.19033.10956390674873739814@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
...
> 2.  I had trouble interpreting the following sentence:
> 
> The
>    NTP state needs to be protected not only between the reception and

My guess is that "protected" (prevent access) actually means "preserved" (kept
for later reading) here.

>    transmission in order to send the peer a packet with a valid origin
>    timestamp, but all the time to not lose the timestamps which will be
>    needed to complete a measurement when the following packet in the
>    interleaved mode is received.
> 
> It took me a while to see that what you were saying was NRP state needs to 
> be
> protected not only between the reception and transmission … , but all the 
> time
> … . The sentence is so long and carries so much information that I lost the
> sense of the structure halfway through.  It would be better to break it
down
> into shorter sentences, e.g. start with “NRP state needs to be protected
not
> only between the reception and transmission, but all the time.”, and then
go
> into the reasons.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ntp mailing list
> ntp@xxxxxxxx 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp 



-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux