Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements-12

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 9/11/21 11:03 AM, Bob Hinden wrote:
Hi Warren,

On Sep 10, 2021, at 4:19 PM, Warren Kumari <warren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Seems reasonable to consider, assuming a BCP can update an Informational RFC?
Any RFC can update any previous RFC?  There are some questions about the
use of "Updates" (see draft-kuehlewind-update-tag); different WGs use it
for different things. If you are trying to catch the eye of
implementers, maybe it would help, but perhaps ask your AD.

Yup, it should be able to.
W
Are you sure?

For example, can an “Experimental" RFC update an RFC at “Standard”?    Can an RFC from one Stream update an RFC in another Stream?   Lots of other cases come to mind.

This seems a lot more subtle than any RFC can update any other RFC.

Bob

I think Warren was answering the question about this particular potential BCP updating a particular Informational RFC both in the IETF stream.

RjS




-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux