On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 4:09 PM Robert Sparks <rjsparks@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 9/11/21 11:03 AM, Bob Hinden wrote:
Hi Warren,On Sep 10, 2021, at 4:19 PM, Warren Kumari <warren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Seems reasonable to consider, assuming a BCP can update an Informational RFC?Any RFC can update any previous RFC? There are some questions about the use of "Updates" (see draft-kuehlewind-update-tag); different WGs use it for different things. If you are trying to catch the eye of implementers, maybe it would help, but perhaps ask your AD. Yup, it should be able to. WAre you sure? For example, can an “Experimental" RFC update an RFC at “Standard”? Can an RFC from one Stream update an RFC in another Stream? Lots of other cases come to mind. This seems a lot more subtle than any RFC can update any other RFC. BobI think Warren was answering the question about this particular potential BCP updating a particular Informational RFC both in the IETF stream.
Yup, what Robert said…
Thanks, Robert,
W
RjS
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
Perhaps they really do strive for incomprehensibility in their specs.
After all, when the liturgy was in Latin, the laity knew their place.
-- Michael Padlipsky
After all, when the liturgy was in Latin, the laity knew their place.
-- Michael Padlipsky
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
