Warren, > On Sep 11, 2021, at 6:20 PM, Warren Kumari <warren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 4:09 PM Robert Sparks <rjsparks@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 9/11/21 11:03 AM, Bob Hinden wrote: >> Hi Warren, >> >> >>> On Sep 10, 2021, at 4:19 PM, Warren Kumari <warren@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Seems reasonable to consider, assuming a BCP can update an Informational RFC? >>>> >>> Any RFC can update any previous RFC? There are some questions about the >>> use of "Updates" (see draft-kuehlewind-update-tag); different WGs use it >>> for different things. If you are trying to catch the eye of >>> implementers, maybe it would help, but perhaps ask your AD. >>> >>> Yup, it should be able to. >>> W >>> >> Are you sure? >> >> For example, can an “Experimental" RFC update an RFC at “Standard”? Can an RFC from one Stream update an RFC in another Stream? Lots of other cases come to mind. >> >> This seems a lot more subtle than any RFC can update any other RFC. >> >> Bob >> > I think Warren was answering the question about this particular potential BCP updating a particular Informational RFC both in the IETF stream. > > > Yup, what Robert said… Fair enough, but good to clarify. Bob
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
