Re: [Last-Call] [art] Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis-10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Valery for your review! I balloted No objection (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis/ballot/ ).

Francesca

On 18/08/2021, 10:24, "art on behalf of Valery Smyslov via Datatracker" <art-bounces@xxxxxxxx on behalf of noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

    Reviewer: Valery Smyslov
    Review result: Ready

    I am the assigned ART directorate reviewer for this document. These comments
    were written primarily for the benefit of the ART area directors.  Document
    editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call
    comments.

    The document describes the technique called DNS Query Name Minimisation, which
    was originally defined in RFC 7816, and since then has been widely using in the
    Internet to improve privacy. The goal of this document is to replace RFC 7816
    (which has an Experimental status) with a Standards Track RFC, adding some
    clarifications based on the  experience of using this technique in the Internet.

    The DNS Query Name Minimisation doesn't change DNS protocol, it only defines
    the way the resolver constructs DNS queries, so the interoperability is
    preserved.

    The document is well written and easy to read.

    Nit: RFC 7626, referenced in the document, has been just obsoleted by RFC 9076.


    _______________________________________________
    art mailing list
    art@xxxxxxxx
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux