Re: Proposed Experiment for IETF 112: Moving the Plenary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 3:27 PM Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Adrian Farrel <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    > Thanks for thinking about creative ways to address these problems.

    > Without commenting specifically about the experiment, I wonder whether
    > you could clarify one thing for me.

    >> fully online meetings have a shorter length of day

    > Why is that?


I thought you were asking why.
It is because online meetings start at 12 noon (in this case Madrid time) and finish after 6 hours.
Not getting into politics of why is that?

Behcet  
    > Is it an attempt to minimise the out-of-comfort timing window?
    > Is it because people who are not travelling also have to fit other work
    > into their day?
    > Is it because "that is what we have always done"?

All of the above, but mostly, it's what the survey said.

I think that it's a problem.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux