On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 3:47 PM John Kristoff <jtk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 13 Sep 2021 21:24:37 -0400
Warren Kumari <warren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As Robert Sparks helpfully pointed out on last-call list, I was only
> talking about this "particular potential BCP updating a particular
> Informational RFC both in the IETF stream.".
Hi Warren et al.,
I have this in the appendix:
The informational document [RFC1536] states UDP is the "chosen
protocol for communication though TCP is used for zone transfers."
That statement should now be considered in its historical context and
is no longer a proper reflection of modern expectations.
The "historical context" notion is my interpretation of how to handle
that early document's statement. Is this reasonable? Should I change
this?
Nah, I think that that is perfectly reasonable.
W
John
The computing scientist’s main challenge is not to get confused by the
complexities of his own making.
-- E. W. Dijkstra
complexities of his own making.
-- E. W. Dijkstra
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
