Thomas, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On 2021-7-28, at 19:36, Thomas Fossati via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Thomas Fossati > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-05 > Reviewer: Thomas Fossati > Review Date: 2021-07-28 > IETF LC End Date: 2021-08-11 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > > The document describes a new header/trailer field that HTTP intermediaries can > use to insert further details related to their handling of responses inline, > for example to assist debugging of complex HTTP delivery topologies. The > described mechanism addresses the problem in a simple, elegant and extensible > way. The document is well written and the instructions to IANA are clear and > actionable. > > Major issues: none > > Minor issues: none > > Nits/editorial comments: > Is it "https://iana.org/assignments/http-proxy-statuses (plural) or > https://iana.org/assignments/http-proxy-status (singular)? Or are these two > different things -- in which case I am not sure what the difference would be? > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
