Ines, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document. Lars > On 2021-8-9, at 21:34, Ines Robles via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Ines Robles > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis-04 > Reviewer: Ines Robles > Review Date: 2021-08-09 > IETF LC End Date: 2021-08-09 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > > The document defines a new Session Description Protocol (SDP) Grouping > Framework extension called 'BUNDLE'. > > The document obsoletes RFC8843 (published on Jan 2021) by removing the > inconsistency between RFC 8843 and RFC8829. - The procedures regarding > assigning the port value to a bundled "m=" section in an answer and instead use > the same port for all bundled "m=" sections; some (initial or subsequent) and a > subsequent offer were inconsistent. This specification removes the > inconsistency by aligning the port value assignment procedure with the > procedure in RFC 8829.- > > This specification updates also RFCs 3264, 5888, and 7941. > > Major issues: Not found > > Minor issues: Not found > > Nits/editorial comments: Not found > > Thanks for this document, > > Ines > > > > -- > last-call mailing list > last-call@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
