Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: RFC 8321 (Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring) and RFC 8889 (Multipoint Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring)to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I don't understand how we can reclassify Experimental RFCs to Proposed
Standard without re-issuing them with a new RFC number, as the
boilerplate is incompatible.  Specifically, the "Status of This Memo"
section says:

   This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
   published for examination, experimental implementation, and
   evaluation.

   This document defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet
   community.

The status-change reclassification is for reclassification in place
(as when we move from Proposed Standard to Internet Standard, or from
any status to Historical).  But to move Experimental to Proposed
Standard, it seems to me that we need a new Internet Draft that
Obsoletes the Experimental RFC, with normal processing of that draft
and publication as a new RFC.

Barry

On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 5:08 PM The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The IESG has received a request from an Area Director to make the
> following status changes:
>
> - RFC8321 from Experimental to Proposed Standard
>     (Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring)
>
> - RFC8889 from Experimental to Proposed Standard
>     (Multipoint Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance
>     Monitoring)
>
> The supporting document for this request can be found here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-rfc8321-rfc8889-alt-mark-to-ps/
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
> comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> last-call@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2021-09-24. Exceptionally, comments may
> be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
> of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> The affected documents can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8321/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8889/
>
> IESG discussion of this request can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-rfc8321-rfc8889-alt-mark-to-ps/ballot/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux